moth

joined 4 days ago
[–] moth@anarchist.nexus 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

they would have to constantly check an app

need the victim to monitor their own stalker

neither of these are true. moth understands, sometimes it is easier to see a headline and jump to conclusions. but when you do that, you form opinions that are uninformed and incorrect.

the monitoring is done by the authorities, and the victim is notified only when the stalker is within 2km of them. at 1km range, the police are notified and dispatched, and the probation officer calls the victim to talk them through the event.

[–] moth@anarchist.nexus 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

worse than not knowing if the person stalking you is waiting outside your window for you to fall asleep, so that they can come inside and rape and kill you? they aren't just made aware of the stalker being near, the police and probation officer are as well so that they can contact the victim and assist.

in the US, the cops would dismiss the victim and let her be murdered.

[–] moth@anarchist.nexus 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this is the intended purpose of the AUR. it was never promised to be high quality or secure code, which is why there are warnings against using it if that is your concern. moth wonders why you complain about something you were told you must accept when using the AUR.

[–] moth@anarchist.nexus 5 points 3 days ago

if moth sees someone stealing, no moth did not

[–] moth@anarchist.nexus 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

don't snipe at people 'cause they understand society better than you do. that's exactly why you should be taking notes instead of talking back.