n2burns

joined 1 year ago
[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I was just trying to refute your assertion that, "Trade ins and selling old phones doesn’t really reduce e-waste." Obviously some used phones are going to be bought by people who need a replacement, and if a used phone wasn't an option, they'd buy new.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I don't know why you are soo hostile. Are you okay?

Your new scenario is still supply constrained. No one gets a new phone for 2 out of 3 years.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Those aren't unpurchased new phones though. As you point out, they're discontinued, discounted and sold.

I was only trying to refute that, "Trade ins and selling old phones doesn’t really reduce e-waste." I'm the same as you, buying used phones, and if I didn't have that option I would be buying new phones instead.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

I completely agree with your comment. I was only responding to the claim, "Trade ins and selling old phones doesn’t really reduce e-waste."

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Why would you make your scenario supply constrained? Your argument is simply if we sold less phones, less would go to e-waste, and duh. That wasn't debate, it was whether releasing new phones every year was wasteful vs new phones being released every 2-3 years.

Your scenario also assuming people buy used or they just don't have a phone. People who buy a used phone generally do so instead of buying a new phone.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Almost certainly not, but I'm just trying to point out it's not a hardware limitation. Though, if it was installed remotely, they would probably have issues printing locally.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (13 children)

That's empirically untrue. If people are selling their used phones and not keeping more than one phone (which definitely happens, but is unrelated to this point), then the exact same number of phones would be produced as if everyone bought new and only put them in e-waste when they were broken/obsolete.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

You're not completely wrong, as they also have thin clients which should be technically capable of running a word processor. It's just a question of whether the prison is going to implement that no/low-cost solution.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, I literally am a government employee, and formerly worked in the military in Radio Comms and IT, often with Top Secret communications and infrastructure . I am intimately familiar with government procedures and limitations.

I never said that end-users would be setting up LibreOffice. I'm just pointing out there's a low/no-cost solution, and it isn't a hardware limitation.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The thin clients should be capable of running LibreOffice, or at least running it remotely.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (15 children)

If you're upgrading your phone every year, that is a personal choice. Plus, most people who do that trade-in/sell their old phone which gets used by someone else.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (20 children)

I don't really see any downsides to annual phone releases. For those people who want to upgrade every year, they can, for everyone else, you upgrade when you want to and you get a pretty new phone. I definitely agree the improvements for slab phones has slowed down a bunch, but there are still pretty big leaps in foldables, etc.

 

Deal sets out pharmacare framework and will cover contraception, diabetes treatment

view more: next ›