narr1

joined 7 months ago
[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago

He's probably a grade-A bootlicker for the fascists, specifically for those sucking each-others' toes in the White House. Conservatives and cis-people tend to be weird like that I've heard. Which is good for those in charge, as the people crave for TikTok for its druglike addictive qualities and thus the current King (bless His orange visage) in the White House (long may He reign) would get more of the people's approval, while having bootlickers like these dudes in charge of it He'd also appease the zionists' thirst to kill, rape, pillage, burn, enact genocide and rule over every muslim and muslim territory in the area, specifically right now the Palestinians, unimpeded, by blocking everything that even slightly smells of being pro-Palestine.

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago (9 children)

I don't know if it's the wording used here or the actual study itself, but this all just seems wrong somehow. Like I'm not arguing against the fact that everything is completely fucked everywhere at the moment, and that obviously hits the youth hardest. But the way this is framed is just kinda stupid I feel.

"Traditionally, happiness followed a U-shape, with youth being a peak period, but it now increases with age instead." Has this claim ever really held water? And according to which tradition exactly? Also define "youth".

"Researchers link this shift to social media, cyberbullying, and reduced social interaction." ah yes, it's those pesky Iphones again! Thankfully it's not, for an example, the actual algorithms themselves in use at said social media, or the reluctance from the profiteers (of the widespread unhappiness of youth) to actually change these algorithms in order to protect the in cases extremely young user base of these, despite constant promises to do so, take Meta and Zuck's talks for an example. But then again, fascists do what fascists do, so straight up lying from these kinds of people shouldn't really be surprising anymore to anyone.

Or could it be that no-one knows how to deal with feeling bad? I, personally, started feeling bad when I was around 15 or 16 years of age, and it didn't really stop until some 3 years ago finally. So roughly about 15 years went by. There are many reasons why I started feeling bad, and kept on feeling bad for so long, but from what I've gathered from these years is that parents in general are left too much on their own devices to give their children the tools with which to deal with strong (negative) emotions, literally what to do when you feel bad. I eventually found help through a certain kind of behavioral therapy, because the extent to which my strong emotions affected and had affected my behavior and actions was basically what kept on fueling my bad feelings and general inability to live (and also large sums and amounts of prescribed antidepressant, anti-psychotic and sedative medications, all of which did fuck-all towards improving the quality of my life by themselves. Only with therapy, which was difficult and expensive to find and acquire access to).

There are parts in this fork of therapy, especially in the topic of emotional regulation skills, that could and should be integrated into the strategy of general upbringing pretty much everywhere. The parents should know how to bring up their kids to have the ability to learn more about these skills (and their importance to life in general) especially coming into teenage, which is a tumultuous time emotionally and behaviorally for everyone I think.

So, a revamping of upbringing seems to be in order, but what's stopping us? Oh yes, what causes every evil in this world: money, or lack thereof.

"[This] may have significant consequences that affect education, workforce participation, and productivity", oh no, not the productivity! WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE SHAREHOLDERS! Never mind the kids, but think of all the fat stacks they are losing due to their wage-slaves not feeling good in a world controlled by capitalism! Whatever shall we do? Well what do we always do? Start a few new wars or something, that should distract them for a while, while simultaneously culling enough people to make it seem like the standard of living has increased. That should buy a few decades or even centuries to make more money.

Fucking hell.

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Indeed. But does it really matter who sells who which area of land, with all the people and other natural resources contained within the area, if it just leads to a future where the rich stay rich, the people (of the areas) stay poor, and the bombings never cease?

As to the question: a desolate, corporation-owned and capitalistically-ran dystopian hellscape apparently?

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I don't care and never will care how good of a product some fucking capitalist techpig has created. I am that kind of a person who feels nauseous when confronted with AI-slop on the internet, like on youtube or something. Just now I uninstalled Firefox and removed my mozilla account because it seemed to me that they are going to turn completely fascist (considering how they force AI and other capitalist shit on you) any moment now.

So yeah, you've outed yourself as either an uninformed or misinformed useful idiot for the capitalists, or a willing bootlicker. I suggest you get up to speed on the goings-on in the world and what you should be doing in order to fight it. Like survival in the woods, how to operate high-calibre firearms, and the means to produce explosives and/or incendiaries. Or, you know, stop complying with what the capitalists tell you to accept - stuff like AI, always online DRM, internet of things...

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure it's because of the unironic recommendation of something as shitty and - more importantly - capitalist as an AI. That's why I'm downvoting at least. Welcome to Linux though.

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Gonna have to go with alcohol and benzodiazepine abuse for this one, basically because it's the only one that I have beaten (citation needed). Only one relapse in the past 10-ish years or so! Though it took a few relationships with it, and I've gone through multiple hospitalizations (some even voluntarily), and because of that combo and all the other shit that was going on in my head (not to mention the cocktail of SSRIs and eventual SNRIs like Effexor at max dosage combined with stuff like Seroquel at max dosage for literal years, of which Effexor is still the bane of my existence; and stuff like ECT) there's like this hazy quality in my own past for me. As if I'm talking about someone else. I can't even remember most of my life from around 2013-2018 or so.

I'd say the worst part about abusing benzos with alcohol is how good it feels. I still have the cravings. Like even now I'd be up for it. That combined with the fact that it only brings out the worst in me, every narcissistic and sosiopathic tendency is not only brought forth but amplified also. And it's unhealthy in general.

So if you don't happen to die in your sleep; once you wake up and realize just how many people you've hurt, when the full weight of your own actions and the coming consequences descend upon you, you just might hope that you did. Vice, thy name is me

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

The type of language spoken in that general area (along with at least one neighboring town) is considered "the purest" in the nation, as it has the least regional differences compared to anywhere else, so much so that the nation's most famous composer's wife (herself an accomplished academic) used to live there back in the day to study the language.

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Well, here's hoping it will get bad enough soon enough for most all of people realizing what is wrong with the world, and whose fault most bad things happening is.

spoilerAlso I got this idea while writing this. So hear me out: you know how during the French revolution the guillotines didn't always "work" the first time around? And people getting killed might have survived the first drop? I started imagining (in my violent fantasies) a situation where we'd group up ALL the fascists and ultra-capitalists and other vermin around, and start decapitating them with a guillotine, but not finish them off in case of the former happening. Just chuck them among the ones left, thus increasing EVERYONE'S suffering by a considerable margin. What you think?

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago

get rekt, capitalist pigs!

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, I agree, and I do believe the kid's parents would also agree. And it's not like the kid is given free reign to roam the internet, looking for the most cancerous, brain rotting, worst AI-slob the internet can provide, no. It's more like a TV basically, with age appropriate shows running in the background, and in our own language no less. He basically seems to occasionally take like a breather of sorts, stopping for something to bite or a sip of his milk or whatever, before running along with his childish endeavors.

But yeah, absolutely. Too much screentime in early childhood can and will lead to developmental delays, and in order to raise the optimal human being one should optimize every aspect of the child's life, adjusting at optimal intervals all according to the child's personal development. But you know, life doesn't work like that. And yet, as I just stated to the comment you replied to, I am thankful for your concern; we're all trying to do our best for this kid. If my little gift of an old laptop can bring joy and happiness into that little dude's life, that is basically enough for me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›