nomadjoanne

joined 2 years ago
[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yup it's true. He was a rapist and ephebophile.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Senescent cells emit growth factors. Hair cells divide. More hair in your ear.

It's just aging. Not advantageous per se, but species' lifespan is adapted to their ecosystem.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Yeah I very much like dislike the culture of Gnome... maybe I'll try something else someday. KDE isn't for me but Cosmic maybe.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, sadly most people. But I like the enthusiasm.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Ehhhh... sorta maybe. Ultimately they can't, but they can make development more difficult.

Also Google has nothing to do with whether or not you're bootloader is unlockable. Get a phone that is.

If you rally want to go down the whole FOSS path it does ultimately become a bit of a lifestyle.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Just use a custom ROM. This sadly will affect app developers. But if you are on a custom ROM without GMS it will continue to work just fine.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (5 children)

What am I not seeing? How does this improve datamining capabilities?

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The issue isn't that. It's that devs may juat abandon projects if they're too naughty for Google cos the custom ROM crowd is so tiny.

Right so think torrent clients, idk, Pornhub app, that sort of thing. Yeah, it doesn't affect your phone. But it absolutely will affect what software is available at all should Google clamp down on this.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Is there any brand that does want to be the Framework of phones?

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For sure. One or two super paranoid banking apps but literally everything else works great with microg.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So extradition varies greatly. But generally (extremely generally, treaties vary a lot) countries will extradite if what the person is accused of is:

  1. A crime in both countries
  2. Carries a penalty of at least 6 months prison in both countries

However basically no country will accept extraterritorial claims of another state simply because it impinges on their own sovereignty. It makes the UK somehow more soviergn than the country where the supposed crime was committed, in this case the US.

The exception to the above rule tends to be crimes against humanity and war crimes. But obviously that is irrelevant to this case.

You are correct that were they actual charged with a crime for violating this act they could not go to the UK.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If they have no infrastructure or legal presence in the UK they are not required to do shit. The UK can block them but that's about it.

The UK does not have extraterritorial jurisdiction! Whatever stupid shit they do on their shitty little island does not affect foreign firms that do not operate there.

view more: next ›