nsrxn

joined 1 week ago
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (36 children)

Everyone who didn't vote got what they asked for

the only thing they clearly wanted was no winner

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago

because out of two candidates, one is always better than another

if neither one should have power, I'm not voting for either one

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 days ago

Not voting is literally a declaration that you don't care who governs you

no, it's not

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I shake my head at ballots cast for elephants

I shake my head at ballots cast for donkeys

cuz I swear to God our leaders

they will be the death of us

there is no vote we can cast to set us free

vote November second if it seems right to you

don't vote if you think it just holds us down

but tell me what we're gonna do on November third

to make sure there's no government left to elect two years from now

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

if anyone thinks any of these spammed links is proof, please point it out. I'm not clicking every one. this is the most blatant Gish gallops I've seen in months.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

calling me names won't change the facts.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn't actually support the claim that you're using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don't make the same very strong claim that you have.

edit: "them" was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (4 children)

no, I'm examining your position, and the evidence provided, and found that they are insufficient.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (6 children)

it shows that the evidence you've provided doesn't actually support your claim

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

the only peer reviewed source you provided spends as much time detailing risks as it does explaining potential benefits, and it's based on a single case study.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

I like open protocols and free software, and during the API exodus there was finally enough content that I wanted to jump ship.

of course I had annoyances with reddit, but I have annoyances with Lemmy too.

it's still preferable imho

view more: ‹ prev next ›