nucleative

joined 2 years ago
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

All the ma and pa shops were forced into selling on Walmart and Amazon and eBay etc.

They are equally beat to shit by the platform pushing their prices down, the platform controlling the visibility of their products, and countless rules that if ever broken result in a permanent platform ban, ending the business.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Is there any insider info on the micro transactions we're gonna see in GTA6 online?

The shark cards thing was a freaking racket for Rockstar so there's no way we don't see that again.

At certain points it was not fun to play online if you didn't have certain assets because you'd get spawn raped over and over by punks who obviously had too much grinding time or too much cash to burn.

I'd have no problem dropping $80 if that was under control and I could expect a fun balanced experience even if I can play just a couple times a week.

If it's going to be pay to win, better make it a free client with an unlockable story mode or something.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Craigslist, or Facebook marketplace?

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago

A default judgement just gives Spotify some leverage to try to collect money, property, and get injunctions. But as we know from the pirate bay cases, that's a losing whack-a-mole battle long term.

But it does make life a bit harder for Anna's archive unless they show up to fight back, which they probably won't.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

ICE engines use a bunch of physical space for accessory components related to the engine. Li-ion powered e-cars reclaimed a ton of that space (i.e. Tesla has a frunk)

Perhaps next using a bit more space for a less dense sodium battery in exchange for a vehicle that is 0% explodable is a worthy trade (if claims are true).

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Isn't like 50% of the internet broken for you if you're only running IPv6? It seems like so many websites , especially small ones, still aren't setting up v6 addresses

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

It saddens me that crypto never really became a legit cash replacement. I guess the incumbents are just way too powerful, and Bitcoin kind of got off on the wrong footing.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is intrinsic value in the truth, I think.

If OP posts a photoshopped picture, that tells us something about OP. If the picture is real, that tells us something about an event of this war.

When we know the truth, we can better decide who to listen to. When we can better decide who to listen to, we have more opportunity to sway the opinions of those around us towards the truth.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I suppose many of the perpetrators who were there are still alive today. I wonder if they sleep soundly in bed at night.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

When I entered the workforce in the late '90s, people were still saying this about putting PCs on every employee's desk. This was at a really profitable company. The argument was they already had telephones, pen and paper. If someone needed to write something down, they had secretaries for that who had typewriters. They had dictating machines. And Xerox machines.

And the truth was, most of the higher level employees were surely still more profitable on the phone with a client than they were sitting there pecking away at a keyboard.

Then, just a handful of years later, not only would the company have been toast had it not pushed ahead, but was also deploying BlackBerry devices with email, deploying laptops with remote access capabilities to most staff, and handheld PDAs (Palm pilots) to many others.

Looking at the history of all of this, sometimes we don't know what exactly will happen with newish tech, or exactly how it will be used. But it's true that the companies that don't keep up often fall hopelessly behind.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The psychology of this case, and other cases like it, is really baffling. The article didn't go into much detail except mentioning the prior attempt, the millions of dollars of life insurance, and her cover story about him being addicted to opioids.

When investigators found those details the picture must have became clear.

What causes one person in a long-term relationship to off the other one? Why not just, you know, do what everyone else does and divorce? I'm sure being a divorcee sucks but it can't be as bad as a convicted aggravated murderer who will live life behind bars

 

I came across this article in another Lemmy community that dislikes AI. I'm reposting instead of cross posting so that we could have a conversation about how "work" might be changing with advancements in technology.

The headline is clickbaity because Altman was referring to how farmers who lived decades ago might perceive that the work "you and I do today" (including Altman himself), doesn't look like work.

The fact is that most of us work far abstracted from human survival by many levels. Very few of us are farming, building shelters, protecting our families from wildlife, or doing the back breaking labor jobs that humans were forced to do generations ago.

In my first job, which was IT support, the concept was not lost on me that all day long I pushed buttons to make computers beep in more friendly ways. There was no physical result to see, no produce to harvest, no pile of wood being transitioned from a natural to a chopped state, nothing tangible to step back and enjoy at the end of the day.

Bankers, fashion designers, artists, video game testers, software developers and countless other professions experience something quite similar. Yet, all of these jobs do in some way add value to the human experience.

As humanity's core needs have been met with technology requiring fewer human inputs, our focus has been able to shift to creating value in less tangible, but perhaps not less meaningful ways. This has created a more dynamic and rich life experience than any of those previous farming generations could have imagined. So while it doesn't seem like the work those farmers were accustomed to, humanity has been able to shift its attention to other types of work for the benefit of many.

I postulate that AI - as we know it now - is merely another technological tool that will allow new layers of abstraction. At one time bookkeepers had to write in books, now software automatically encodes accounting transactions as they're made. At one time software developers might spend days setting up the framework of a new project, and now an LLM can do the bulk of the work in minutes.

These days we have fewer bookkeepers - most companies don't need armies of clerks anymore. But now we have more data analysts who work to understand the information and make important decisions. In the future we may need fewer software coders, and in turn, there will be many more software projects that seek to solve new problems in new ways.

How do I know this? I think history shows us that innovations in technology always bring new problems to be solved. There is an endless reservoir of challenges to be worked on that previous generations didn't have time to think about. We are going to free minds from tasks that can be automated, and many of those minds will move on to the next level of abstraction.

At the end of the day, I suspect we humans are biologically wired with a deep desire to output rewarding and meaningful work, and much of the results of our abstracted work is hard to see and touch. Perhaps this is why I enjoy mowing my lawn so much, no matter how advanced robotic lawn mowing machines become.

 

My project is a "breathing" white 12v LED strip controlled by an esp32 on a dev board, and switched with an IFLZ44N mosfet.

In my video you can see it working but also hear the power supply complaining.

I'm using the LEDC Arduino library which allows me to select the frequency and resolution for PWM.

If I set the frequency too low the whine is extreme, but at this setting it's the best I've been able to achieve, which is about 9000Hz. Unfortunately you can still hear the sound from across the room!

It is a cheapo solid state power supply that claims it can output 12v up to 25A. I tried my desktop supply and it emits some whine too, so I don't think replacing the power will totally fix this.

Is there a technique for tuning the frequency or even just masking it somehow?

 

Saw this come through from Octoprint remotely. It was an 8 hour print and died about at about the 7:15 mark.

view more: next ›