nymwit

joined 1 year ago
[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

then we get to really specifically define individual, perspective, and perception (can you perceive while unconscious? I guess?), all sorts of fun knots to tie oneself into. I always thought the difference in sense vs. perception was the thinking about it, but if it's processed at all by the "unconscious" I guess it's still perception? I mean, I'm gettting twisted up thinking if my individual consciousness has a perspective from which it perceives the world

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's more they are murdering the current instance of a pattern of matter and with it the biological implementation of the pattern of consciousness. Another instance of the same pattern is created near simultaneously. To flip it, aren't they life creating machines as much as murder machines?

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agree for Occam's if someone is actually suggesting they are replaced nightly or your last Thursdayism, but as for conceiving of parallels to a made up teleportation technology and its philosophical implications, is the break in consciousness/self awareness for sleep not a reasonable comparison?

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, is there a scientific consensus on what constitutes consciousness? I thought that was a stumbling point on trying to pin down the various parts of the study of it. I wouldn't say brain activity ceases while sleeping like that other comment but I'm in the camp that thinks the break in consciousness/awareness-of-being in a ST transporter is not really different than the break when sleeping.

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

discussion in here looking like old r/teenagers with predictable takes

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

BM planned to leverage its Watson technology as part of the acquisition, foreseeing its use for weather analytics and predictions. The deal, which closed the following January,[27] does not include the Weather Channel itself, which remained owned by the Bain/Blackstone/NBCUniversal consortium, and entered into a long-term licensing agreement with IBM for use of its weather data and "The Weather Channel" name and branding

wikipedia page for The Weather Channel

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The Weather Channel tv channel isn't owned by IBM and isn't part of this deal

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only the mobile app. They don't own the tv channel.

view more: ‹ prev next ›