pazukaza

Yeha, that's monopoly talk. I guess I was expecting something else when I read "evil".

I don't really think people are locked-in by any means, there are so many alternatives. People just prefer Google because it provides the best search results and they don't care about privacy. The alternatives are pretty good, but people just want the best. I usually have to go back to Google to query something whenever DDG isn't providing good results.

Before downvoting, at least explain why people are locked-in. Aren't there alternatives to Google? They are definetely creating a horizontal monopoly by acquiring all the companies in the chain, from advertisers to operating systems... but there are alternatives to Google (the search engine). I use DDG everyday, how am I locked-in to Google? I'm not arguing against the monopoly, I'm arguing against the lock-in.

Google- DDG, Swisscows, Qwant

Google Chrome - Mozilla

Google Cloud - DigitalOcean

Android - /e/

Google Phones - Fairphone

Google Meets - Zoom

Google maps - Waze

Google photos - Dropbox

YouTube - Vimeo

I really don't see the lock-in. People just want monopoly-grade service quality without the monopoly. You can't have both.

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but what is so evil about what was written in the document? To me it just sounded like the guy was bragging about their dominance.

TIL "culpable" is an English word too. Culpable means guilty in Spanish and I thought you were a Spanish speaker doing spanglish. Now I know you're just a man of culture.

People downvoting you clearly don't know that school administration can be into bullying as much as the kids. Talking by experience. I think you can report the images in Instagram by saying you're in them and don't want to be.

No humor in Lemmy, please.

I bought an Alexa but I disable the mic. Do they still listen?

Mmm do you know Linux containers? Like Docker containers, for example?

You need to understand Linux namespace and Linux containers to understand this trick. It isn't super advanced to be honest, just a Linux feature that is very useful.

It can be overwhelming if you haven't worked with containers before: https://youtu.be/fTcit7F5Bcg?si=rQlq0mJyapIpOlx8

Basically you can have multiple "network stacks" in the same machine, and they are isolated. By network stacks I mean things like the netfilter rules and the routing rules.

So, if you deploy a VPN inside a network namespace that isn't the host's namespace, the host won't route the traffic to the VPN by default. Only the processes that are attached to that network namespace will process the network packets with the netfilter and routing rules of that namespace. So, if you only attach the Firefox process to the network namespace of the VPN, only the traffic generated by that process will go through the tunnel.

Ba dum tss

I think it is just a matter of convenience. Very few people buy lasers to aim them at airplanes. Give everyone a laser and you'll get a thousand reports of people aiming lasers at their plane.

I usually have a VPN client running in a container and then attach the browser instance to the network namespace of the container.

Is it fast and furious too?

I meant now that there will be an option. Plus, I'm not blaming, that would make no sense because I thought the phone wasn't out yet.