I disagree. They both serve a different part of the market. OsmAnd is a heavy tool with thousands of features, Organic Maps is a lightweight tool for more general users. Both approaches have (dis)advantages.
No, it is not. OSM is a database of geodata. The rules are clear: what is in there, must be (semi)permanent and observable. A fire staircase meets those requirements.
If you (or a dataconsumer) doesn't care about this data, they can simply take a copy and delete from that copy what they don't need.
Don't map for the renderer. If OsmAnd doesn't handle it correctly, complain on their issue tracker.
Will this work in Europe?
YUNoHost-server!
Yeah, the fediverse is amazing. I've had cases where I answered a lemmy thread without even realizing it was on lemmy ;)
Imagery sources are tracked here: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index
We track how to load the aerial imagery (thus: the WMS-link), what license it has and where it is applicable. Only aerial imagery where we have permission for is allowed.
I think OP means a firepit