overview for pooperNickel

Linus Torvalds affirms expulsion of Russian maintainers in c/technology@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Maybe you can provide an example?

A note on Universal Monk: in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

RIP. I'm sure he'll be back with alts, but here are the final stats:

UniversalMonk stats pulled 10/25/2024, 3:20:53 PM EDT

Account created 78 days ago (8/8/2024, 9:21:38 PM EDT)
6,272 submissions (= 2,017 posts + 4,255 comments)
80.4 avg submissions / day
11.9 mins avg time between submissions (assuming 8 hrs of sleep / day)
87,814 downvotes accrued (~ 1,126 downvotes / day, 0.20 u:d ratio)
- -70,379 net reputation score
- ~ 1.3 mins between downvotes on avg
- ~ 14.9 avg downvotes / submission
  - ~ 13.2 avg downvotes / comment
  - ~ 19.5 avg downvotes / post
  - ~ -11.4 avg reputation score / comment
  - ~ -13.4 avg reputation score / post

~ 16 typed pages (3,789 words) written / day

236,631 total words written as comments, 58,852 total words written in posts
~ 76 mins / day writing comments (40 wpm)
~ 32 mins / day making posts (40 wpm + 30 secs / post)

~ 140 hrs commenting/posting in 78 days, which breaks down to:

~ 108 mins / day
11.2% of their waking hours

None of this takes into account time reading others' posts/comments, or alts this user may have. See the modlog for any communities they've been banned from.

Top 5 duplicate submissions (of 914 exact matches and 683 which are 70%+ similar)

spoiler 27 x 'Thank you! :)'

27 x 'Thank you! :)'

26 x 'Thank you!'

22 x 'Yep!'

22 x 'Agreed.'

:::

Fetch user stats yourself with: https://codeberg.org/p00perNickel/lemmy-user-stats

No, Trump Did Not Endorse a Military Assault on People 'Simply Because They Oppose His Candidacy' in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're clearly picking the less popular opinion. This is either obvious to you or it isn't. The numbers are there, and you chose your reading of them. I cannot do anything about that.

No, Trump Did Not Endorse a Military Assault on People 'Simply Because They Oppose His Candidacy' in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yes, the mark of being non-contrary -- cherry picking the opinion you already agree with as evidence

Most voters think the economy is poor, but split on whether Trump or Harris can fix it: AP-NORC poll in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You can try to use the fact that the script attempts to be objective against it, sure. That's just called "bad faith". 11.6% of a person's day is a lot, and you don't get to just erase this important piece:

None of this takes into account time reading others’ posts/comments, or alts this user may secretly have.

The most active posters on Lemmy rarely compare to this, and I've yet to see anyone as singularly focused. Not to mention the copypasta aspect which the script does a decent job of highlighting.

Is this a leftist politics magazine?

Lemmy is a leftist place. Sounds like it's not for you. No one is interested in your troll apologia.

No, Trump Did Not Endorse a Military Assault on People 'Simply Because They Oppose His Candidacy' in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

You're bending far over backwards to be contrary. Just so you know, it's not of concern to me.

A note on Universal Monk: in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Here is the tool: https://codeberg.org/p00perNickel/lemmy-user-stats

Let me know if you have any issues with it!

Most voters think the economy is poor, but split on whether Trump or Harris can fix it: AP-NORC poll in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Here is the tool: https://codeberg.org/p00perNickel/lemmy-user-stats

Let me know if you have any issues with it!

A note on Universal Monk: in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

Here is the tool: https://codeberg.org/p00perNickel/lemmy-user-stats

Let me know if you have any issues with it!

A note on Universal Monk: in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 17 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, if I didn't think they were fucking up the whole ecosystem and showing other potential trolls they can too, I'd just block them and move on.

A note on Universal Monk: in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago

UniversalMonk@lemmy.world "Socialist Mormon Satanist" stats pulled @ 10/22/2024, 1:37:27 PM EDT

Account created 75 days ago (8/8/2024, 9:21:38 PM EDT)
6,131 contributions (= 1,932 posts + 4,199 comments)
81.7 average contributions / day
11.7 mins average time between contributions (assuming 8 hrs of sleep / day)
83,172 downvotes accrued
- -65,774 net reputation points
- ~1.3 mins between downvotes on average
- ~14.3 average downvotes / submission
- 0.21 upvote to downvote ratio
231,519 words written as comments, 58,014 words written in posts
3,861 words (~16 typed pages) written per day
~77 mins / day writing comments (40 words / min)
~32 mins / day making posts (40 words / min + 30 secs / post)
~137 hrs commenting/posting in the past 75 days which breaks down to
- ~109 mins / day
- ~31.9% of a full time job
- 11.4% of their waking hours
See the modlog for more info.

None of this takes into account time reading others' posts/comments, or alts this user may secretly have.

Top 10 duplicate submissions (of 306 exact matches and 234 which are 70%+ similar)

spoiler 'Thank you!' x 28

'Yep!' x 28

'k' x 23

'Agreed!' x 22

'I don't know what you mean.' x 20

'I don't have to explain anything to you. Thanks!' x 15

'Right?' x 14

'Every vote for Harris is stealing a vote from thir...' x 12

'Exactly!' x 11

::: spoiler 'To cut through the nonsense and save everyone time...' x 10

A note on Universal Monk: in c/politics@lemmy.world

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

Now that they were banned from politics, their rate of engagement went WAY down. Kinda speaks volumes.