And the free market value system, because it doesn't value externalities.
positiveWHAT
joined 2 years ago
Many small things are important too, like recycling, and voting for parties that enact green policy. "Screen time" is too vague to mean energy intensive.
Yes, but when a group of sadists takes over a neighborhood by force and call themselves overlords because they have weapons. Is there a Human Rights council? Who enforces that everyone has mutual power and don't gather around a figure to prop themselves up?
I reiterate that this is where it all started and some people aren't cooperative enough for this system of thought.
It might be an ideal to strive for, but to realize it we must screen people for constructively cooperative psyche/DNA. That screening is probably needed if we want conscious life to go far anyway so I'm in.
But that's how we started. How are you gonna stop the people that then gather and creates groups with leaders that ravage the land like the golden horde?
Aye. If we could get a global leadership to fix tax havens and regulate for sustainable praxis we'll get closer to the fully automated gay socialist space communism we all would enjoy.
Ordinary from NFS:Hot Pursuit 2
Hmm. It does sound a bit unhinged. Do I dare say tyrannical? Evil even? Legitimising themselves as a target?
I originally moved from the API change, but also eventually got banned for calling out the genocide in Gaza.
But it would be interesting to see what they complain about.
view more: next ›
No, the First-Past-The-Post system + media polarisation makes it a two party system. If you had proportional election you would have more parties, because the rest votes don't dissappear. The US election system is from the 1800s and outdated.