pragmaOnce

joined 2 years ago
[–] pragmaOnce@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 years ago

Literally same. Changed my daily driver from windows a year or so ago and its been night and day. Having to be intentional about acquiring games and getting them running with proton/lutris (not too much work these days thanks to Valve and GloriousEggroll) made me less of a collector and much more focused on what I want to play. Which means I play a lot more. Also this year has had some phenominal titles for indie and AAA.

[–] pragmaOnce@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  1. GPUs predate 1995
  2. They solve a set of problems different from those handled by cpu's
  3. The existence of GPUs wouldnt 'curb the growth' of the other processors
  4. The government would be best positioned to benefit from that rapid growth, since it is a state level actor that can regulate the use and acquisition of technologies
  5. GPUs have also developed very quickly since their advent.

So like the previous comment mentions - No.

[–] pragmaOnce@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah thats a pretty good summary of what I was trying to convey. If this didn't levitate, no one would've blinked twice. But since it did, its being investigated more thoroughly to check if its one of those other things that levitate (or actually a superconductor)

[–] pragmaOnce@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

What I've gathered from many of the discussions around this topic is that the levitation is a notable feature of superconductors due to th Meissner(?) Effect. So if it couldnt levitate, there would be no reason to suspect that it is a superconductor. Because it does levitate, superconductivity is one of a few possibilities.

There have been indicators it may be a semiconductor instead, but apparently the conditions to accurately produce the material are vague/not fully understood - so attempts at reproduction have failed to rule it in or out 100%

[–] pragmaOnce@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Solid answer here. Worth pointing out that MX Linux has other DEs than xfce. I originally left Ubuntu for pop!_os but wanted to use KDE. After realizing that swiching to Kde removed most of what makes pop special, I started looking around again and landed on the ahs/kde version of MX. Its been great! Still a debain distro so its very familiar, but I dpnt have to worry about Canonical making poor decisions upstream.