pulaskiwasright

You help economic classes and people in need. If the people in need are primarily of a specific demographic than that demographic will be helped the most… along with everyone else who needs it. And you won’t get poor people from demographics that aren’t being helped fighting you. You’ll get their support instead.

This is end game capitalism. They have their own cities with their own laws. You are essentially forced to live and work at the same place and buy your groceries and other essentials from your employees. You’re basically an indentured servant at that moment.

You’re making an awfully large assumption that Russia could leash him into fighting for them again. It’s obvious and understandable they didn’t trust him.

Why wouldn’t they kill that man who used that group in a coup and then try to assume control of them?

Obviously he got thrown in jail for being an idiot. No other poor person would help Trump.

Why is it cruel and unusual to kill someone instantly with a bullet and not cruel and unusual to electrocute or hang someone?

It’s not actually written in the constitution that killing someone instantly with a bullet is a cruel and unusual punishment. It’s an interpretation of the constitution that is frankly bizarre considering the ways we do actually execute people.

I didn’t say they should use a firing squad. I said they could shoot you in the part of the brain with a bullet that will kill you instantly.

Bullets aren't an instant death, the cattle thing would be but considered brutal.

Bullets and the cattle thing are both instant when they are fired at the right part of the brain. Why is more brutal and less humane? If it kills them immediately, then it’s as humane as killing someone gets.

still, for glam rockers raging against oppressive authority

Did he say he was for the government stopping trans people from making their own choices?