pulaskiwasright

joined 2 years ago
[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You help economic classes and people in need. If the people in need are primarily of a specific demographic than that demographic will be helped the most… along with everyone else who needs it. And you won’t get poor people from demographics that aren’t being helped fighting you. You’ll get their support instead.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

This is end game capitalism. They have their own cities with their own laws. You are essentially forced to live and work at the same place and buy your groceries and other essentials from your employees. You’re basically an indentured servant at that moment.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You’re making an awfully large assumption that Russia could leash him into fighting for them again. It’s obvious and understandable they didn’t trust him.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Why wouldn’t they kill that man who used that group in a coup and then try to assume control of them?

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago

Obviously he got thrown in jail for being an idiot. No other poor person would help Trump.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Why is it cruel and unusual to kill someone instantly with a bullet and not cruel and unusual to electrocute or hang someone?

It’s not actually written in the constitution that killing someone instantly with a bullet is a cruel and unusual punishment. It’s an interpretation of the constitution that is frankly bizarre considering the ways we do actually execute people.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I didn’t say they should use a firing squad. I said they could shoot you in the part of the brain with a bullet that will kill you instantly.

view more: ‹ prev next ›