Glad you found a happy cozy home. Appreciative that I can reply to you from heart of the old beast!
Relative to all the well known commercial social media platforms though aren't we all into something here hardly anyone else knows about, whether 10 users or a few thousand?
One easy way to test accessing your site externally is use a free web proxy to try to load it.
For example (not a personal recommendation, just a random search result) https://wproxy.net/
Here is link to settlement claim page I got via cbc (global liked here provided no link?)
Company I worked for a dozen years ago, who had many significant clients, already had most of their logos created by randos on Fiverr for pocket change.
This blog post hyperbolically has "do-or-die moment" in title, and then concludes with with the final breathless line, "we must act now, before it is too late" (which it claims is "every scientist's most familiar motto", whatever that means). Yet nowhere at all in the blog post or the paper is any suggestion of what "act" could or should be done to avoid this "die" condition.
The "limitations" section of the article is a bit telling (and at least seemingly honest).
I like also how the blog post admits, 'there is still no standard definition of what a “paper mill” actually is.' In fact no definition is offered by the blog post or the article, though the term is used constantly. (As though the problems of "paper mills" hasn't been a known concern for dozens of years already.)
The blog post concludes with "If the model public goods game offers any prognostication". But the "game" model is one that the author just made up earlier in the post, and arbitrarily setting the rules, boundaries and parameters for. So basically this is saying, "if my [extremely simplistic] made up analogy is true..."
I sympathize with the authors' concerns, but this article seem to me to have a lot of problems, and not offer much of what was promised. Can't help but wonder if PNAS picked it up just for flame-bait... which would be ironic.
Archaeologist Flint Dibble covered this, interviewing the actual archaeologist who works with this stuff. She definitely has ideas.
'her lawyer reminded her they were fighting for “the principle of free speech.” “I’m hoping that the activists will now realize there are limits to their behavior,” she said.'
So the "principle of free speech" they were fighting for was the principle of limits to free speech?
Meanwhile, my coreopsis have barely emerged from the soil... Sigh.
A certain sythe sweep near the end of Grim Fandango.
The dip in the river near the end of Bioshock Infinite.
Jumping into the thing near the end of Outer Wilds, and coming down where you come down going through what you go through.