Is it possible that alternatives are not widely used because most people don't want to use alternatives in the first place?
rchive
I think people know it's addictive and generally bad, they just also know that prohibition usually doesn't work.
I think it will. It will drive menthols underground and they'll become more dangerous just like alcohol during Prohibition.
My login screen has my 2 monitors flipped and I can't figure out how to fix it. Otherwise, I like it.
If it's a required thing they should obviously get paid for that time.
I don't think anyone is trying to calculate some kind of moral blame. They're identifying a scenario they don't want to happen and they're trying to prevent it. Fault doesn't matter.
I'm talking about whether people are physically capable of breaking with their party on a single issue. They obviously are.
You can disagree with your party on one issue. There are tons of Democrats who are opposed to increased gun control, for example.
I've seen a lot of advocates for legalization, if not glamorization, come from the sex work industry. Aella, for example.
I think they're saying theoretically the underage students could view her content or even interact with her without her knowing it's them.
We won't know with Harris because she's extremely unpopular regardless of her sex. Her losing anything is only evidence of how unpopular she is individually.