remotelove

joined 1 year ago
[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The admins were using the legal staus of shrooms in other countries (besides their own) as a justification for removing the community. Ok, cool. Now apply that reasoning fairly across other communities.

Clarifying a point is not hard and they do get very specific with other rules as well, if you haven't read them. They could easily say that drug trade on lemmy.world is forbidden. Easy.

Also, chill with the ad hominem arguments. Trying to use insults to prove yourself correct just makes you look like the jackass.

Again, I don't think you understand the full scope of the points I am making. I understand your points, but they are just bad ones.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Your input is fascinating, but misplaced.

The purpose of this thread was for the admins to clarify what actually is illegal. Allowing a marijuana community has the same risks for an admin as pictures of other things like shrooms in other communities.

I personally would like to know where it is illegal to post and talk about any drug, honestly. Especially so if the drugs we are talking about are widely decriminalized.

Growing, selling or trading drugs online is generally illegal. I understand why those kinds of posts should be removed.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lemmy Connect is quite good for Android.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

One would think he would eventually cancel himself.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think big brother is on to you, bot. Your links haven't been working lately. It could be a "me" problem, since I am trying to view the video through a Lemmy client that doesn't quite play well with ad blocking proxies.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

https://youtu.be/FKv0gXUN67g

Sorry. My inner Rick and Morty was leaking.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We need to assign a good name for this global system of interconnected networks. I admit, I am baffled as to what a good name should be.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

false equivalence

Do you even know what that means? I am writing off this conversation as pointless.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

accountability

Your point of reference is flipped. I don't need to take accountability for something that the admins are doing.

optics

Banning one community for being "illegal" while not banning another gives some fairly spectacular visuals.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You are totally missing the point, just like you missed the point in your last deleted post.

I think we all want to see most instances and communities thrive. With this being the most "mainstream" instance, it gives many users their first glimpse into Lemmy and the rest of the federation. If the first thing people see is the same shitty admin actions that Reddit was known for, they puts a huge damper on adaptation.

If the first few days are spent looking for an instance where their communities and comments won't get banned, it just makes for a shitty experience.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is why I am asking for clarification around rule 1. I am sure many people would be glad to comply and start communities on other instances because of local laws and such.

It's an extremely vague rule, is what my point is.

318
Please fix Rule 1. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by remotelove@lemmy.world to c/support@lemmy.world
 

A shroom community was removed from lemmy.world as it was considered "illegal" content by the admins. The logic behind this is boggling, to say the least.

Marijuana is considered an illegal substance in some states in the US and is still federally illegal. /c/trees should be banned, correct?

Clown pictures of Putin are absolutely considered illegal in Russia, so that should require and immediate ban.

Freedom of speech can also be considered illegal in some places.

Incest is considered illegal so that should automatically trigger a ban on all incest porn, real or not. Hell, porn is universally taboo, so that shouldn't have any place on this instance, I guess.

You see where I am going with this? Rule 1 is a catch-all and needs clarification. Simply saying something is illegal is not quite enough. Owning and sharing pictures of shrooms is not illegal. Trading spores or mycelium is generally not illegal either.

This is not about me being salty (which I am) about the community being removed and forced to relocate. It's the odd bias that was applied to justify its removal.

Please note that I said fix Rule 1, not remove it. There are some really bad things on the internet that shouldn't use lemmy as a safe haven.

 

I have been using CentOS for years as a somewhat stable go-to for a long time, especially in business environments.

Honestly, it was a very simple fire-and-forget distro that I happen to know extremely well. However, with RH completely migrating to an Elon Musk inspired business model, it's time for a change.

While I don't have anything against Debian or Ubuntu, it was never my first choice of distro. (I'll give them another go shortly though, as the Ubuntu server distros were quite clean.) It boils down to silly things like yum instead of apt and such.

I suppose I am really asking what the most generic server-style distros are super popular these days. Any suggestions?

view more: next ›