remram

joined 3 years ago
[–] remram@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

Exactly this. Services and software are not the same thing, you're asking for a service recommendation and it can't be open-source software because it's not software.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have never met anyone refer to "screen off" as "sleep".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_mode

The terms everybody else are using are: "sleep" = "suspend to RAM" = "S3" and "hibernation" = "suspend to disk".

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Ok so what do you call "sleep"? You've now listed suspending, sleeping, and hibernating as 3 different things.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Suspending to disk usually requires a password on resume.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I have a lot of trouble with the window/pane management. Moving panes to a different window is rather difficult. The server>session>window>pane hierarchy also seems way too deep for my humble needs.

The fact that the active window syncs between sessions is also really odd. Why can't I look at different windows on different devices?

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Use LVM, it will give you all the features of RAID 0 and more (encryption, migration, snapshotting, multiple volumes, etc)

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Nextcloud, Syncthing, PeerTube, Vaultwarden, Gitea (+drone, drone-qemu, gitea-pages), Wireguard, FreshRSS

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I feel you, but on the other hand if every single community member tries to help, even if they have no idea or don't understand the question, this is not great.

Anybody can ask Google or an LLM, I am spending more time reading and acknowledging this bot answer than it took you to copy/paste. This is the inverse of helping.

The problem is not "the loop"(?), your (LLM's) approach is not relevant, and I've explained why.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What was "the point"? From my perspective, I had to correct a fifth post about using a schedule, even though I had already mentioned it in my post as a bad option. And instead of correcting someone, turns out I was replying to a bot answer. That kind of sucks, ngl.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Did it write that playbook? Did you read it?

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

unattended-upgrades can already do that actually, i e. you can configure the systemd timers. But that's insufficient for my needs. Using a mirror seems like the best option so far.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What? I said I'm already using unattended-upgrades.

39
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by remram@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

I am using unattended-upgrades across multiple servers. I would like package updates to be rolled out gradually, either randomly or to a subset of test/staging machines first. Is there a way to do that for APT on Ubuntu?

An obvious option is to set some machines to update on Monday and the others to update on Wednesday, but that only gives me only weekly updates...

The goal of course is to avoid a Crowdstrike-like situation on my Ubuntu machines.

edit: For example. An updated openssh-server comes out. One fifth of the machines updates that day, another fifth updates the next day, and the rest updates 3 days later.

view more: next ›