...or that AI is how Jesus will be resurrected.
riskable
joined 3 years ago
I've said it so many times: Everyone that's ever partnered with Trump ultimately regrets it. Always.
Milk protein can be grown in labs now:
Yes, but what illegal experience does he have? Without that, I fail to see how Trump would consider him qualified!
Bailouts only happen to companies with loads of employees. An AI company with loads of employees is an oxymoron!
Talk about sending the wrong message! Some of us appreciate depressed, angsty teens behind the counter because it reminds us of our youth!
The assumption here is that the AI-generated code wasn't reviewed and polished before submission. I've written stuff with AI and sometimes it does a fantastic job. Other times it generates code that's so bad it's a horror show.
Over time, it's getting a little bit better. Years from now it'll be at that 99% "good enough" threshold and no one will care that code was AI-generated anymore.
The key is that code is code: As long as someone is manually reviewing and testing it, you can save a great deal of time and produce good results. It's useful.
It would turn into a prince! An unstable prince of undefined behavior.
That's the thing, though: Removing that mercury filtration system is going to be expensive and require re-certification. There's no point. The price has already been paid.
It's like someone heard that mercury removal from coal power plants costs a lot of money and saves lives so they said to themselves, "saving lives‽ We can't have that! The more people that die from pollution, the better!" And set policy based on that instead of examining the reality of the economics.
I suspect that OpenAI is on a path to spend as much money on data centers and hardware as possible so they can go bankrupt and sell those assets to Microsoft for pennies on the dollar.
It's a scheme to filter billions and billions of dollars around the "AI everything" hype train directly into Microsoft's coffers.
The most fowl of homes.