"It's AI all the way down!"
"What about stuff before AI?"
"That was analog intelligence which is still AI!"
riskable
joined 2 years ago
well kid, if your parents don't care then neither do I. Watch all the porn you want.
FUCK YES! You are not their parent! YOU DO NOT GET TO DECIDE what their kid gets to see! Porn is for adults to look at but if a kid sees it there's no danger. Kids don't drop dead because they saw some people fucking on the Internet!
How hard is this to understand‽
Don't let anyone ever say this administration wasn't a shit show. He posted it himself!
It's possible that a huge number of sites that are currently free will turn to paywalls but that won't make the local AI useless. You'll just give it your login credentials for any sites you want it to search and it'll do it's thing (and no, captias don't work with AI models... They're only good at stopping basic crawlers).
Caught my obscure reference of the day with this one 👍
YES! This is how villain organizations are supposed to work! For once it wasn't sheer incompetence.
Taking out the competition like a villain boss. Maybe other ~~villains~~ Republicans can learn a thing or two from this guy!
I was referring to the Nixon impeachment.
Remember: "Left wing nonprofits" are groups that do things like:
- Free healthcare and food for the poor
- Free rides for medical treatment, work, etc
- Free legal services
- Various forms of poverty relief
- Environmental protection
- Immigrant and refugee support
- Labor rights
- Criminal justice reform
But what about "right wing nonprofits"?
- "Faith" initiatives
- Religious education (only Christianity in the US)
- Tax policy "research"
- Second Amendment advocacy / violence enablement for ~~white people~~ everyone.
- Law enforcement "support"
- Anti-abortion
- Anti-vaccination
- Religious education
- Government restriction/constriction (aka "limited government")
- Various forms of groups that collect money but only actually provide "thoughts and prayers"
They really don't understand reporting if they're being like this. Reporters don't need access inside the Pentagon. They can get whatever TF they want through leaks from trusted sources.
By letting the reporters in, they can keep an eye on them and see who they're talking to. That way, when there's a leak that they don't like they can review the logs and have a slightly higher chance of catching the leaker.
Denying credentials to reporters (en mass) is a one-way ticket to chaos.
Canoodling in the threads.