rm_dash_r_star

joined 1 year ago
[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemmyonline.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bad news for me, I use youtube a lot with an adblocker and it's essentially ad-free. It's going to be a bad day for me when they start cracking down. It doesn't surprise me, but it's a bummer.

The wording on those applications would definitely raise a flag for me. They totally sound bot generated.

I've joined a number of instances looking for the best performer, hops, pings, server response. That's what I've been saying in my applications. Interestingly, my first sign-up was on Beehaw before I knew what I doing and they are the only ones that rejected me, about a week after I applied. Made me think, what did I say that was so awful? No biggie I already had some good instances to sign into.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemmyonline.com 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

That's a good indicator when you find your instance blocked by a lot of other instances. I think the lesson is don't leave low hanging fruit out there.

It actually amazes me there's people out there doing these bot infestations. I mean there is some effort involved. Why go to all the trouble, what's the payoff? And how are they able to find new unadvertised instances so quickly.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemmyonline.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is going to happen a lot as Lemmy grows. There will be more communities with the same name over different instances. Though the full canonical name is the actual name of the community, not just the prefix name. For example !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com and !piracy@lemmy.ml are two different communities with two different names.

There's no federation wide rules about reusing the prefix name of a community. You can have as many repeats as people create. It's just the nature of how the decentralized architecture works. In other words you can't duplicate names on a particular instance, but the entire Fediverse doesn't care because it differentiates by instance name.

I have a number of duplicates I subscribe to and it's transparent when I look at the front page of subscribed communities. However I have to look at each duplicate individually when selecting a community to view. An option to look at communities in groups would be helpful. I think that's a reasonable feature to incorporate. It could be as simple as adding a checkbox to select more than one community to view at a time.

I don't think it will ever be possible to physically merge communities across multiple instances at a base level. It's likely something that exceeds scope of design.

 

The instance I usually log into is sitting on 0.17.4 and I wanted to see how 0.18.0 looks. So I created a new sign in on a good looking updated instance to give it a whirl.

I'm not happy with some of the changes and the interface feels more clunky to me. Yeah there's some improvement in response after dropping web sockets and it's nice the sort orders work better, but that's all I have to say positive about it.

Searching for communities is giving me fits now. When I go to search for a community from the community page it defaults to an "all" search where it should default to a "community" search. So now I have the extra step of selecting the "communities" option from the search page, but first I have to do the default "all" search to get to there. It's just super clunky and annoying.

When subscribing to communities 0.17.4 would get stuck in subscribe pending mode, but I'm having even more trouble with 0.18.0. When I call up a community the subscribe button is missing. I have to reselect the community for it to appear. Then I'm still getting weird behavior in response to pushing the button. In some cases it does nothing and repeated presses are required to see subscribe pending. It rarely shows joined within a reasonable amount of time. There's still a bunch pending since 8 hours ago.

I really don't like how the first reply to a post shows the reply bar. It looked so much better when only a reply to a reply started the reply bar chain. It really bugs me as far as the page aesthetic.

I have some other small gripes with the new version, but those are the ones giving me the most trouble. I mean don't change stuff just to change stuff. Fix things and make them easier to use, not harder. Don't worry about stupid things like changing header fonts and reply bars. Give me the stuff I really-really need;

  • a compact view option
  • a setting to open all links in a new tab
  • granular settings for default sort orders
  • clickable headers in lists for sorting.

People have to come from somewhere. Since Lemmy is "Reddit like" and Reddit is the biggest of its type, well that's what's where people are going to come from. I mean if you don't new get users you're not going to have a community.

I first took a look at Lemmy some time ago and honestly is was like, "hey man, this party is dead." It wasn't until the recent influx of users that Lemmy got active enough to keep my attention.

There's always going to be clueless people that don't understand how things work. Rather than complain about them I'd rather try to be positive and help them. Though some people just can't be helped and you have to let them slide.

Another issue is the more people you get into a community the wider the range of attitudes. You will get people that don't have nice things to say and there's no avoiding that. It's something that has to tolerated. Of course moderation can help a lot, but it's not going to preclude anybody from ever getting offended.