rob299

joined 10 months ago
[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 2 points 10 months ago

I don't think it would be illegal unless it's a Chromebook they lended to you directly to work at the company. If you went to a store and bought it your self it's perfectly legal to throw ubuntu on that Chromebook.

Here's where things start to get harder though..

Whether they will fire you.. eh idk if I would take that risk. But if anything just ask the people working there for their opinion on it.

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 11 points 10 months ago

It's optimal to them. You just don't understand Youtube's perspective of it yet. And then it's unoptimal for them when you watch with the adblocker.

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

That's a way to look at, but i'l personally still be using Peertube. instead of 3rd party YouTube apps.

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah be like me and just use Peertube, I don't even notice this stuff untill people complain about it haha.

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I will with you halfway through with this, here is how I view it.

If you have little experience with telling between safe sources and sketchy, then yes, stick with the defualt.

If ypuu know about some safe appstores or repositories then that's when you could say you are qualified to make thes decisions. Like I know Fdroid is safer and better than the defialt on everyway for the users best interest, but if you dont know your sources then you should not sidelode untill you do know how to make good decisions.

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's different then the owner off the defualt android appstore telling you. If a device manufactuer did say this, i'd question why.

Did google pay them to?? or more specific to your comment did microsoft pay them

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Just one question,are you certian all of them are seeing record profits, sure the big names like kroger might be but what about the smaller ones.

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He doesnt want to name specific types of people or it might make it seem like google attacking specific people. So instead all users get bundled in this. They will use the most careless users as a reason to take it away from all users. It benefits them.

I think that Google really just wants to get less and less people to sideload and then shame others that do through public shaming. 'oh that's dangersous son; you shouldn't be sideloading that Fdroid app! Google said so.' That's why they brought it up to begin with, this is as google goes over court with epic games over the app store fee.

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I meant as a user, go ahead and switch to it. But to rid of the monopoly, they nee competition. No one is creating that for normies who don't know how to Linux. If Linux phones make their way into walmarts and targets, then maybeee. It has to be as simple as buy it, and use it. like how you buy a Nintendo switch and it just works.

[–] rob299@bookwormstory.social 1 points 10 months ago

I think it's news as they say it as they are in court against epic games about their Google play store.

view more: next ›