roy_mustang76

Definitely

I have a coworker who has been with my company as long as I've been in this entire career that we are both in. Between the two of us, I am the expert, because if something goes one iota off the rails, she can't handle/process it. This is a problem because shit goes off the rails ALL THE TIME in our business. How she hasn't figured out how to handle that in 15 years, I don't know

Bernie would not have won in 2024. In hindsight, it seems clear that winning in 2020 was at best a booby trap. If Trump had won re-election, the Republicans would be grappling with inflation anger (since absolutely none of his policy preferences would have slowed it, if anything they would have accelerated inflation)

Now, as usual, the Republican is going to get credit for the hard choices the Democrat had to make in office and the vibes that "Republicans are better for the economy" will continue, unless his tariffs fuck everything up so quickly that even the oblivious can't ignore it.

Given that we have a President who won't be trying to conduct his own coup currently... Yes

As he honestly should. Dude's too high on his own supply.

He had it at 70/30, when the poll/pundit environment was giving Hillary 95% chances.

He gave much more realistic odds than most any pundit of that cycle.

It's a shame that Federal law supersedes state law, huh Texas?

If anywhere near that amounts of armed idiots shows up to DC this time, I'm certain the National Guard will be waiting for them.

We saw the limits of relying on Capital Police and DC Metro Police last time. A Biden admin transitioning to a Harris admin is not going to make that mistake again, and the MD National Guard will probably be ready and waiting for the assistance call like the one that came way too late 4 years ago.

I'll be disappointed if the Harris campaign doesn't have that cued up for the week before Election Day

Never been to Europe, I see.

It's entirely possible to have floor to ceiling doors for bathroom privacy, you see it plenty in Europe. That being said, gaps in stalks have always been weird to me. I don't need anyone trying to figure out who is taking a dump through the gap

Well sure, you can always find examples of something being sold for more than average (whether that's because of greed, human error, quality of product, or market strategy), but it doesn't make his statement accurate.

And again, yes I understand that Walmart is selling eggs at around that price point. I'm just saying that if I can regularly find eggs at my local Kroger-owned grocery store for $1 less than Walmart, when Kroger itself is a wannabe monopolistic entity, then Vance is probably stretching the truth as best, if you're uncomfortable saying he's lying.

Because the "regular" grocery store he's standing in is clearly selling them for less than that?

Seems like a pretty roastable unforced error to me.

(Also I know not everyone has options around them, but traditional grocers still tend to be cheaper on most grocery items than Walmart or Target, there is in fact a cost to the one stop shop)