s_i_m_s

joined 1 year ago
[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Maybe for some models? IDK I haven't seen one but I've noticed there is a much smaller selection of matte protectors in general vs glossy.

I don't think there's any reason they can't.

[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It does though. Installing a matte screen protector was one of the very first things I did after I got it.

Put a matte screen protector on my iPad a few years ago to cut down on the glare and that was it, everything had to be that way from then on.

Downside is you do lose some image crispness but it's so very worth it for the huge reduction in glare.

Also matte protectors aren't nearly as popular so there's a lot smaller selection to chose from.

[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mint (MATE). It's preconfigured closest to what I want, with just a couple tweeks I can do whatever I need with utilities and a GUI I'm familiar with.

If Its a headless machine Ubuntu or Debian. Again familiar with both can do whatever on both without having to relearn low to build a wheel.

Primarily a windows user but I do use Linux for some applications.

[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

If it's room sized and sold to other companies it will rapidly be in multiple countries.

There wouldn't be any way to keep it to one company with it being public knowledge.

Like realistically I'd think any country would ignore whatever laws on the books and just outright sieze the tech as a matter of national security and duplicate it for their own use if they found out a company was hiding such a thing.

From there it'd again leak to all other major countries in short order.

If it's small and easy to duplicate, (can it replicate itself?) It would spread like wildfire and would like piracy be completely uncontainable.

I don't think there is anyway the tech could be either contained or kept secret any real length of time.

[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (6 children)

I don't remember that bit but I think I only watched the first season of the Orville and that was years ago.

But yeah really depends on how difficult the equipment itself is to replicate.

If it's some massive machine the size of a room it's going to make some company extremely rich, they'd sell product for slightly less than normal market value taking over the market with perfectly consistent product and insane margins allowing legal capture.

Why feed everyone when you can almost literally print money?

If it's something small that can be easily transported and duplicated? Piracy. Nobody will give AF about patents and everyone will have them within a couple years no matter what laws they try to implement or how they try and prevent it.

This has actually already happened with media and this is exactly how it has played out and a lot of people still seem to be in denial.

They can complain and sick lawyers on as many people as they want but they can still make a million copies of something that cost 400 million to make for less than than the cost of a gumball.

The law surrounding it is completely broken and it's crazy that so many industries are trying to continue on like nothing has changed.

[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Sometimes I wonder what they would do if you could make endless perfect copies of objects like you can mp3s.

Dududdo you wouldn't copy a car. You wouldn't copy a cheeseburger Copying is a crime.

Like remember it's only been recently that it became possible to make endless copies of media at effectively no cost.

[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

as it seemed disingenuous to present both sides as equal

Because it is.

[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah considering they didn't discover electricity until the 1700s then they didn't even invent one that lasted long enough to be practical until 1879.