samsy

joined 2 years ago
[–] samsy@feddit.de 18 points 10 months ago

Is this a joke? Manjaro unstable branch sounds like unstably thing to find in the Linux universe.

Go for fedora, it's the only well known distro with newest software, stable and good community support.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I bet @IzzyOnDroid@floss.social disagrees.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good to see a detailed guide. Blocky sounds really interesting. I used pi-hole first and switched to adguard-home for it's dot/doh features. Blocky could be best of both world's, but the missing interface is problematic, or isn't it?

[–] samsy@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

What a nice milestone. Congrats to the devs. I tried a lot of IDEs but geany is just simple and perfect.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Using it over years and discovered the expert installer a few months ago. Really good stuff, especially since they decide to build an extra repo for non-free-firmware, because a lot of people ditch Debian when their shitty WiFi doesn't get recognized immediately after install because it needs a non-free-firmware.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don't get me wrong I support Debian, too. I decide to use it at work and we have actually more than 40 systems running on Debian.

Fedora is mostly my choose for client desktop. And I prefer to advice new people to it, just because installing fedora is easier than Debian.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

This rolling release thing was just a terrible time in my Linux life. It's like you are scared of the "you have to start from the ground, erase everything, thing if you want to install win7 or winXP" but the price for a rolling release is a hell of updates every day.

I am done with this annoying updates. Debian has both world's, the stable side just updates if your security is at risk and the unstable branch is near the same like a rolling release and what Debian calls "unstable" is more stable than any arch-based distro. Btw a change between stable and unstable can be done at every time after install.

I personally prefer fedora because its as stable as Debian but has mostly actual packages like rolling releases. And would be my advice for op. BTW. Try out kinoite. Undestroyable Linux is the hot shit actually.

https://fedoraproject.org/kinoite/

And don't be scared about not rolling release, a version change is just a big update. Nothing got destroyed like in the good old windows time.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

In theory that's correct. But if you look at the list of progressive changes and contribution. RHEL created a lot of common standards. And we don't talk about stuff like snap here, we talk about systemd, pipewire etc.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago (5 children)

What makes fedora to the devil?

[–] samsy@feddit.de 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Change Ubuntu to Debian and the list is correct.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago
  1. Wireguard
  2. I run my own DoT/DoH server and able to connect it from everywhere. This makes option 1 mostly obsolete.

PS. And yes, I fucking love to solve captchas. No, I am not a Robot.

[–] samsy@feddit.de 18 points 11 months ago (12 children)

I don't touch my fedora DNS settings because my openwrt router handles DoT for the entire network.

view more: next ›