sean

Give me some hope for me at least, maybe I'll turn out decent 😔

How many women in Columbus Ohio have this hair style in the airport area? Since you seem to be sure it's here too lol

People are allowed to guess ages wrong you know lol, why does this guy have to defend it?

Hell yeah man. I just want to own my own place so I can sit around a fire, drink my beer in peace while I play some acoustic guitar with a dog and no one else. That's all I want in this life 😭

Been playing for 20+ years myself, I'm getting fucking giddy over learning bass again. Heck, I've been learning some Alice In Chains on acoustic and I'm having a blast! Also learned jigsaw falling into place by Radiohead. But 2 years ago I didn't know these songs and thought they were out of my reach, but got pretty stoked when I got them, felt like I finally got "good" at guitar 😂

The comment above you demonstrated exactly the seeing of the potential of AI in wrong hands when they said it "can be used for bad things" like insurance. So the "if you didn't say what you said, I'd disagree with you" statement you're making is kinda funny lol

Just because you don't like when the word theft means capitalism is bad doesn't mean capitalism is actually good

The mere fact that ChatGPT “knows” about certain things indicate that it ingested certain copyrighted works.

This is the bit I'm responding to. This "mere fact" that you propose is not copyright infringement by facts I've stated. I'm not making claims to any of your other original statements

Verbatim reproduction may be copyright infringement, but that wasn't your original claim that I quoted and am responding to (I didn't make that clear earlier, that's on me).

"Apologies" for my autistic way of communicating (I'm autistic)

Facts aren't protected by copyright. Regurgitating facts about a thing is in no way illegal, even if done by ai and done by ingested copyrighted material. I can legally make a website dedicated to stating only facts about Disney products (all other things the same) when prompted by questions of my users.

But regular people from countries which are sanctioned by countries do benefit from it, yet their benefit is still not worth it? I understand being critical and wary and vigilant, but to outright deny its usefulness for people with little options outside of official government sanctioned forms of economic power? You've deemed their plight and cause as outweighed and tainted by the wealthy who they have zero control over.

Think of a co-op vs charity.