Btw the close back is resistant to 200 gauss. If you want more resistance and still a see through case back, METAS certified movements like Tudor and Omega will do the job.
seungflower
joined 1 year ago
Yeah it'll be fine; modern movements are already more anti magnetic than the vintage ones. Even if it becomes magnetized, it'll be easy to demagnetize yourself and most watch makers will do it for free. The closed case back is more historically accurate but yes, it's fun to see how a movement works. Get the 42mm then if you have the wrist for it then. I do enjoy Tudor s smaller dive watches though.
Btw I wear mine on a single pass RAF style NATO as a daily GADA. Here's a close up pic for reference. I guess this is modern vintage.
I tried on the black bay but it was slightly too big for my wrist. I have the 39mm reverse ๐ผ hanhart. If I had the choice I think I would exchange it for the 417C version bc that's 39mm but with a see through case back. The Hanhart has a flyback and the bezel is more useful than a tachymeter. Also, the Hanhart is definitely more utilitarian in design. They even bend the chronograph and the minute hand at the end to prevent parallax. Hanhart regulates their movements to 0 to +8 per day btw. Also I think the Hanhart might be slightly thinner.
Airport security has little effects on watches. But the thing to watch out for is dropping them ๐ when taking them off when going through the metal detector.
But if you're doing the standard mm wave scan, I think you can keep them on.