shadowedcross

joined 4 months ago

That's a number higher than the estimated number of planets in the observable universe.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So many "competitors" coming out, but I still think I'm just gonna wait for the Deck 2.

Can confirm, still suck at every PDX game despite a thousand or hundreds of hours in them.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That 0.1% is the number of players who have the achievement, not OP's completion progress. But it's also probably very small.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If you were traveling at a constant 100 mph, it would take you 249 hours to travel around the circumference of the Earth, and 2,389 hours to reach the Moon. If the distances are actually accurate then these achievements should be nigh on impossible to get in any reasonable amount of time. That now 0.2% of players have them means the distances aren't accurate, that they used an achievement unlocker, cheated in-game, or have a fuckton of playtime.

Not necessarily. It's directly integrated into the program and platform that most PC gamers use, meaning it doesn't require any third party software and is probably easier to use. Personally, Geforce's solution stopped working reliably for me a long time ago.

This is why roguelikes that are actually closer to Rogue are called traditional roguelikes these days.

Doesn't matter. It's still going to be the same Ubisoft formula. It's a shame as well because the potential is always there but they're too afraid to actually innovate, not even considering the actual QA issues.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unsurprising given the state of the PS version.

One of the many reasons I hate Winter. Earlier sunsets make my depression even worse.

view more: next ›