That system was laid out too late into human development, though it's still possible it just needs to be given time. Though that won't stop me from using my own system.
Either too much or too little depending on who we're talking about. You have the people who will amass a protest in the thousands because one person was mistreated and sometimes only a single person who will react at all when a thousand are mistreated. And people wonder why sociopathy exists.
I bet they'd find that extremely helpful.
Or Wizardology.
What do you mean?
One could say I believe in what amounts to a few simultaneously (it's "complicated"), and they all imply rules that adherents shouldn't impose. I have a friend who identifies as a Baha'i (and another who has a history of Scientology in his family if not also identifying as a Buddhist) and they impose more than I do.
It depends on the form of strike. Are they outside with "Krusty Krab Is Funfair" signs? Are they sitting at home playing solitaire? Did they join the rival business?
I was thinking more along the lines of original Star Trek, where you had aliens posing as Greek gods, disembodied immaterial Galactus hands stretching out from planets, and parallel universes where evil versions of the characters can cross over from, and yet where at the end of the day, the characters can nod their heads and give a toast to "the godless universe".
It was very much like Doctor Who if Doctor Who didn't just explain everything with a simple "it's all wibbly wobbly".
Even the people who revere God but not "no matter what"?
How would you define a cult?
The most concise way to think about it is to think Freemasonry combined with Star Trek.
Art.