shneancy

joined 1 year ago
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

and how do you know that?

you feel like a victim because society is indeed oppressive towards LGBTQ minorities, but if you see yourself as a victim all the time you'll just end up depressed and miserable.

no, Steam is not being biased against minorities, intentionally or otherwise, they're just not. This feature was in beta for a long time and for most of the beta anybody could join any family from any country. The choice to make it more restricted wasn't to fuck up people who don't live with their families - it was to prevent the abuse of the feature that must've come to light during the beta.

Steam wanted to improve their family share, and the did, greatly in fact. But they had to include limitations to prevent cases where someone gets financially abused online, or someone joins a stranger's family and then gets kicked out immediately and needs to wait 6 months join any other family, or someone joins a game hoarder's family and then never buys a game again.

That limitation can still be worked around the good old way - by logging into another person's machine and joining their family that way, but for that you need to trust the other person to not fuck up your account - and that's enough to discourage most of the extreme cases. They're just not going to beam that information to the public as that'd defeat the point of establishing that limitation in the first place, and even encourage people to trust random strangers that could have malicious intent.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

drag, go touch grass. Seeing every minor inconvenience as a personal attack of the heteronormative patriarchy can't be good for you

and again - I'm telling you this for the third time, you can go around the region lock.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (9 children)

as a trans person, can you not call everything that inconveniences you as a trans person transphobic? You're devaluing the actual struggles we have to face with "i can't play video game because of transphobia :(". Besides, there are ways to go around the region lock, just Google the "transphobia" away

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

you can still try to go around it by doing the same as before, log into the other person's machine

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

honestly i just played at the lowest difficulty and picked a druid who by sheer chance turned out to be pretty OP in combat (imo). I still wanted to avoid bloodshed but when it came to it, I engaged combat from behind a corridor or a tight spot, slapped some ground spikes, and all melee enemies just died trying to walk up to me

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (4 children)

build yourself a pacifist character and try to talk your way out of conflict!

i hate turn based combat as well, but i pushed through and i don't regret it

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

being an anarchist (or a working person) doesn't particularly help with not being forcibly drafted, and neither would Putin care if i told his goons "hey can you not bomb me and my family, you see, i'm an anarchist and this is not my war :)"

like i get the theory of what you're saying, but the practice is a bit less wordy and more- bomby. is NATO my ideal version of reality? no, of course not. am i glad it's a thing as someone living in poland? fuck yes i am. i can't really work towards helping people realise capitalism bad if i'm dead

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

i'm an anarchist, but i'm also polish, and we kinda need NATO right now, with the whole Russia thing at our doorstep. i know it's not ideal, but fuck, not many other options out there and i do enjoy not being forcibly drafted to war

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this is not about wanting this is about companies taking advantage of vulnerable people who should be grieving. This can cause lasting psychological harm

you might as well be saying, if someone came to a drug maker, and wanted some heroine, and provided ingredients for heroine, and agreed to whatever costs were involved, isn't that entirely their business?

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

and yet, the "genius inventors" keep creating Torment Nexuses

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

wow, so many reasons

  • to create a mimic of a person you must first destroy their privacy
  • after an AI has devoured all they've ever written or spoken on video it will then mimic such person very well, but most likely still be a legal property of a company that made it
  • in a situation like that you'd then have to pay a subscription to interact with the mimic (because god forbid you ever get actually sold something nowadays)

now imagine having to pay to talk with a ghost of your loved one, a chatbot that sometimes allows you to forget that the actual person is gone, and makes all the moments where that illusion is broken all the more painful. A chatbot that denies you grief, and traps you in hell where you can talk with the person you lost, but never touch them, never feel them, never see them grow (or you could pay extra for the chatbot to attend new skill classes you could talk about :)).

It would make grieving impossible and take constant advantage of those who "just want to say goodbye". Grief is already hard as is, a wide spread mimicry of our dead ones would make it a psychological torture

for more information watch ~~a prediction of our future~~ a fun sci-fi show called Black Mirror, specifically the episode titled Be Right Back (entire series is fully episodic you don't need to watch from the start)

view more: next ›