shrugal

joined 1 year ago
[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (19 children)

Yes, of course. They created the design, it cost them time and money, you want to use it, so you should pay part of those costs. Or to put it differently: You both use the design, why should they be the ones to pay for its creation, and not you?

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (21 children)

I pay taxes, those were used to pay the people who build the bridge. And yes, taxes should be fair. If it's a private bridge then the owners have every right to demand a fee for crossing it.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (23 children)

Idk what to tell you but: Yes it does. We can't really argue if you refuse to elaborate your point.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (25 children)

The justification was that creating things has a cost, even if a copy doesn't, and that we should distribute that cost as fairly as possible among the people benefiting from the creation.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (27 children)

What unjustified claim did I make that you disagree with? Seems all rather uncontroversial to me.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (29 children)

Mine, obviously. But feel free to correct me if you disagree with something.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (33 children)

But the original creation cost time and money, which you're not reimbursing the creator for. The moral thing to do is to pay your share of that if you make a copy, even if the copy itself doesn't cost anything.

It's like going to a concert without paying the entrance fee. Sure it's not a big deal if only one person does it, but the concert couldn't even happen if everyone acted like this, or the organizers would have to pay for it all by themselves.

If you want to morally justify piracy then start with the ridiculous earnings and monopolies of big media companies, or the fact that they will just remove your access to media you "bought". Piracy is like stealing, but sometimes stealing is the right thing to do.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Afaik the bot auto-creation is disabled now, but it used to mirror some Reddit subreddits by automatically creating bot accounts for every Reddit user posting in them, and using that to post the same content in a Lemmy community. That's how the instance got over a million users, pretty much all of them are bots that do whatever the Reddit user with the same name is doing in one of the mirrored subreddits.

What you are describing is another part of the plan: Allowing the original Reddit users to take over their mirror accounts on Lemmy. Apparently it just creates accounts for them if no bot exists yet.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Bots on alien.top do that afaik. They impersonate real Reddit users after all.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

How do they handle bots? Seems to me this statistic could be heavily inflated. Or do they account for that?

Here is their listing of users per instance, looks a bit sus to me ("Benutzer" means "Users"):

List of users per instance, showing bot instance alien.top at the top by a wide margin

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

It works everywhere except Android tablets, and you can just use Molly for that.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Anakin Skywalker agrees: A monarchy is great if you have a really nice and competent ruler, we just had unusually bad luck with those in the past!

view more: ‹ prev next ›