simonhamp

joined 11 months ago
[–] simonhamp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Sounds interesting. I'll DM you

[–] simonhamp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Wow, it's the first time I'm hearing about a company not being allowed to use PHP... especially when sometimes PHP is the best tool for the job (but of course, I would say that).

I think part of the appeal for me is that the size isn't that big... I don't want to be inundated with clients and developers... plus as I'm already a part of the Laravel community myself, I feel like I know it well and this platform can stand out a little more.

It's a niche, but not too small

[–] simonhamp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks. This is great feedback. Some of these points are already covered in the system, but not exposed on the publicly-available search tool (which is intentional)

[–] simonhamp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

My experience—and I believe the extended experience of many other orgs—is that it's actually quite tricky to find a reasonable pool of developers with specific skill sets using LinkedIn without considerable time investment, let alone get that down to a warmed shortlist

[–] simonhamp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is a top marks answer! Thank you 🙏🏼

[–] simonhamp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It currently sounds like you're wholly dependent on this one partner right now

That feels like a major risk already

Can you find a way to diversify your relationships to mitigate them pulling out or building their own version? Or can you lock them in with some long-term contractual agreement? Who owns the IP?

Aside from those questions, when you're tight on resource but you have to keep building, you have a pretty important choice to make:

Knuckle down and build as fast as you can while ALSO looking for funds (i.e. put in the hours and hard work and do what you must)

OR

Accept that development is going to be slower and ruthlessly prioritise accordingly - focus attention on the next big value-add for potential customers that is also low hanging fruit from a dev perspective and keep trying to bring in more paying customers

[–] simonhamp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks 🙏🏼

[–] simonhamp@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Get your business plan and a pitch deck worked out before speaking to any investors

Remember that investors want a bang for their buck - so a hefty return and that means a decent chunk of the business

Your plan should focus on the size of the market (potential revenue figures), how you plan to tap that market (GTM strategy), a high-level plan of feature development (how are you going to stay ahead), some proof that you've done some risk and competitor analysis (is there already market validation and do you know your enemy), and that you have some idea of how to reach profitability (can this thing be self-sustaining and when)

Then start looking for investors with a portfolio that includes businesses in that industry

If you're pre-revenue or only have one customer, that doesn't exactly scream traction... most investors will want to see that you're either already generating sizeable revenue ($100k+/year) or that you're able to sign up new customers regularly and reliably and that they don't churn out quickly

 

Hi folks, hope you're having a nice weekend so far 👋🏼

A couple of weeks ago I acquired a site that wasn't turning over any revenue.

The site is Laradir.com, a directory of software engineers who predominantly use the Laravel PHP framework.

The acquisition was a completely private one - no third parties or platforms involved - and went through very smoothly. I'm very happy with the acquisition and how the process went.

I did the valuation myself on a costs-plus basis after having looked through the code and gotten a base understanding of all the assets. It was very much a "micro" acquisition

I relaunched the site after teasing/hyping on Twitter (~2.5k followers) for just over a week, and managed to get some decent exposure across the Laravel community.

Signups increased by 50% in just 3 days and I started to offer small ad spots for "sponsors" as well as reducing the fee for businesses to use the platform.

The site is now up to ~$200 MRR, which is all from the sponsorships, but no profit yet as I'm ploughing that and more into driving traffic to the site

I haven't yet made any sales to businesses for the core service despite having made a handful of direct calls to potential customers (folks already in my contacts/network)

For most of these calls, the reason not to proceed falls into one of either: a) we're not hiring right now, or b) we don't use these platforms for hiring

I'm really happy with the acquisition and the initial progress, but obviously I'm keen to start proving traction from the business side as soon as possible.

What are my blind spots? What am I missing? What can I do to help convince businesses in/around the Laravel space that there is massive potential value here for them?

As the service is tapping into the "recruitment" sphere, one theory I have is that the winter slowdown and the somewhat uncertain jobs market are preventing teams from committing. Is this valid?