smayonak

joined 2 years ago
[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wouldn't any text editor with a delinter be superior

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Not writing or coding. No one uses it for anything except when Microsoft forces someone to use it as a default text editor.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oftentimes the simplest answer is the right one

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03071840308446849

There are numerous analyses which show the same link between economic vulnerability, high birth rate, and extremism. Which is why the right wing are always chopping away at support programs, economic development, and birth control.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The subtle difference was that Pelosi's attacker had his hands on the hammer as well as Pelosi and they were both white. It looks like they were unsure as to who the attacker was.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I think the reason it looks like religion motivates violent extremism is because the demography of the people most vulnerable to extremist propaganda are also more likely (statistically) to be more religious.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I warned conservatives too but are they going to trust someone they know a little or someone they know a lot? The same thing happened with Bush. People form their beliefs based on their communities and families.

My view is that if conservative media could be held liable in civil court for passing off information they knew to be false then every single propaganda network could have been sued off the air and internet by their own audiences.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All that is true, but the shit he's saying goes through a filter. Not just the filter of Fox News but also the filter of those who disseminate that bullshit.

A very sad and unfortunate fact about most Americans is that they do not read the news and most of their political knowledge comes from their friends and family or communities. The propaganda dissemination models that are currently driving the US toward fascism are reliant on there being a core group of malignants who disseminate the disinformation that they get from Fox, AM radio and elsewhere.

The group whom you're referring to as "conservatives" are demographically the most exposed to right-wing propaganda. The so-called "average" cluster, as revealed by the Cambridge Analytica scandal. This group (originally targeted by Facebook) is particularly sensitive to the message pushed by conservatives ("law and order", "traditional"). But if you look at the messaging that's being used to manipulate them, it's the same stuff that was used to target Germans in the Weimar republic.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Many farmers don't read the news and they are prone to getting their info from their friends and communities. For whatever reason, around 30% of the people in those communities are unempathetic deceivers who delight in spreading lies and conspiracy theories. And propaganda networks empower those people.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Decades of defunding and stripping down public education is now bearing fruit. We can thank right-wing political interests from both parties for the death of the US educational system. But this is what led to an overreliance on video as a news dissemination platform as people do not read much compared to other economies.

Weimar Germany, by the way, was the best educated country in the world in the thirties. This is what made Nazi propaganda more effective: they were able to use propaganda campaigns to target vulnerable populations. We now know from Cambridge Analytica that this group exists in all cultures. The so-called "Average" group.

Being ignorant doesn't excuse their actions, but it explains their motives in a way that makes them more human. We're all fallible, some of us more so than others. Look at it this way: it's not a crime to be completely cut off from good news sources. There's nothing evil in getting all your news from your church buddies or the people at work. Most news is negative anyway so people naturally avoid it.

The people who control those groups are horrible human beings. Narcissistic, sadistic, nihilists. Unfortunately, liberal democracy does nothing to stop them from spreading their message to vulnerable groups.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Many of them are horrible trolls. But then there are those who do not watch the news and get their facts from their local communities, like churches or co-workers. The great majority of people in the US do not have a good news source and have never had a class on media bias. Their whole way of thinking revolves around obeying authority. That environment does not encourage independent thought. And in the presence of 24/7 propaganda networks (Facebook, AM radio, Cable News), there's no way for them to get substantiative information on topics relevant to their daily lives. It's not just right wingers, but also people who would normally be on the left politically, but who are instead overwhelmed with data on how vaccines cause autism, etc... I meet people all the time who are concerned about my media consumption patterns because I do not know about how dangerous GMO is, or how my use of computers is rotting my brain.

The problem with modern information economies is not everyone has access to good information, even people who read the news all day long are exposed to Russian disinfo.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Youre right that they should have known better but you cant blame fools for being fools. You can blame the conmen who scam them.

I monitor conservative and nationalist media and they promote lies all day long. The people screaming about whats going on? Completely misrepresented or marginalized in their coverage. Its impossible to have democracy with propaganda networks ranking number 1 in the public consciousness

view more: next ›