southsamurai

Great, now President Scroob is going to come and suck it all up

Probably me telling my manager to go fuck herself.

I think it was justified, but barely.

It was a fast food joint, so not exactly a job I was willing to take shit over.

I have long hair, and have since jr high. So did other employees, but only women and girls. A hair was found in food and it had to be mine, despite my hairnet, despite it being the wrong color, and not the same length.

I pointed all this out and she told me I needed to cut mine. I asked if this was a new policy for everyone, she said just me. So I told her to go fuck herself. Now, I'd have just said no politely, and let her fire me for something bullshit and collect unemployment. But back then, I had less self control.

After that, it was probably a dude I worked with at a nursing home. Weird dude, but a generally good partner to work with. Unfortunately, he liked stealing panties from patients. Why? Nobody knew. He said he didn't wear them, and it wasn't a sex thing. And that's all he would say on the subject.

Dude was lifting them after they got back from laundry services, stuffing them in his pocket. He had taken enough that it was noticeable, as in the rest of the staff was having trouble finding them for the patients to wear. You expect some loss of clothing via laundry, or wear and tear, but not just underwear, and not in bulk unless there was some kind of accident in laundry, like a bleach spill.

The laundry staff were questioned about it, and it was pretty obvious it wasn't them since they could have just said items were too damaged or stained, and nobody would have questioned it. They would have had records of tossing them, even if they were stealing them and faking it.

Dude got found out when he fucked up and pulled a pair out with his keys in the break room. You can't mistake a pair of big cotton panties for anything else, and the patient name was inked on.

With that, he was questioned by the head nurse, then the administrator, and gave no satisfactory answer. He did, however, return the pilfered panties when threatened with a call to the police. Not that it would have amounted to anything, but he didn't want the attention.

When I talked to him later on, he still wouldn't say why he did it. We had all kinds of silly theories cooked up, and I suspect that the one that he had some kind of mother or grandmother fixation was true, minus the bit about him being a budding Norman Bates taking them to dress up his mom's body.

Last I heard, he left the state, so I doubt I'll ever run into him to try and ask again.

You're confusing concepts. And yeah, I know it's a shower thought, so it doesn't need to be anything like that.

Wabisabi, beauty in the eye of the beholder, and the concept of "trash" beauty are related, but not the same.

Wabi sabi is more about realizing that mom matter how close to perfect you get something, there's always the human element, so embrace those imperfections. It has the benefit that that which is broken still has beauty. This leads to the practice of visible repairs. But it's more like how antiques are more valuable when you don't fuck with them doing refinishing or painting, you do repairs to keep it functional, not to make it like new (and if you knew how often I've seen people ruin any monetary or historic value in knives, you'd want to use one on yourself).

The same kind of idea, seeing the beauty and value in things as they are can indeed be extended to things that were never crafted in the first place, like seeing a trashed room and appreciating the human element in it. But the key is that the mattress in and covered by trash isn't the same thing as a broken vase.

And that is different from the spartan, minimalist to the point of apathy kind of single guy with no furniture arrangements. You can be minimalist and/or spartan in living without living in trash.

Now, being real, once you get things like food that is going to become a health risk, and pizza boxes can be, then that's no longer about accepting this as they are, and becomes just being nasty (and I don't throw that word around lightly). You can be disorganized, and still be clean. It's harder, but completely doable.

That doesn't take away from seeing a photo of such a vista and appreciating the beauty of the composition, and how it shines a light on the human condition, on how we are. It does not, however fall under the concept of wabi sabi as it exists in its home culture.

Yeah, sadly I agree. Would still love to see it though. He would be brilliant in the role, even if it was only one movie

Like, I get what you mean, I do.

But it's simply not accurate. Great as a shower thought! Just not accurate regarding the motives of all prostitutes and porn actors.

It isn't about poverty, though that is there. It isn't about addiction, though that's definitely a big factor in both. But it has never been that simple.

I think what would be more accurate is that in a post scarcity environment, prostitution and pornography would cease to be about necessity. You would see way less of either, with pornography possibly becoming only self produced.

Prostitution would probably cease to be an exchange of goods or currency, which does mean it would be eliminated on a semantic level. After all, if it isn't an exchange of goods/currency for a service, is it still prostitution, or is it just two consenting adults having sex? At that point, it's no different than hooking up with someone you met via something like grindr.

But that doesn't mean the basic idea of someone having sex with strangers for some kind of exchange would die entirely. It could end up as a more direct exchange of services. "Hey man, if I give you head, could you help me move this fridge?" "Sure dude, sounds like a fair trade to me." You might even still have street level hooking, where people are just looking for some kind of exchange of sex, even if only for the rush, but it isn't about money. Wouldn't be much, most people aren't into that. But there are people into that.

The internet put a huge dent in the porn industry. It didn't kill it, and I don't think it can. But people making their own porn for fun and sharing it changed the industry. Enough that I'm certain it will never go away entirely, though the exact shape of it may be so different as to not really count. But porn, at its core, is not about the porn industry. The industry could well die within years of scarcity disappearing, maybe even less time. But you'll still have people making movies of themselves that they allow other people to enjoy. You'll likely even have hobbyists that have skill with the film making that get asked to do the filming (I know a guy that does exactly that).

But, yeah, good shower thought!

Pulled this one just now. Got a giggle

Success!

Are you dense? Or just looking to troll someone?

It isn't a universal thing, but yeah.

As others have said, a tablet typically refers to a prebound pad of paper, and most typically to one that is bound across the top, ala legal pads.

Like anything language related, usages bleed and shift. Back before bound paper was a thing, it was used to refer to any flat writing surface.

It goes back to tabula, from Latin, where the primary (but not only!) use was for the equivalent of a placard or other inscribed label, as well as any writing surface.

Think like a writing slate. The term tabula rasa is essentially the same as "clean slate", and refers to writing on an actual slate being erased.

So, tablet over time has been used for pretty much any writing surface at all, and it's not unusual to see it applied to any bound writing surface, even if it's a loose-leaf binder. It is archaic though, and wasn't exactly common in that specific usage (not that I've ever heard or seen anyway). But I have seen and heard it used that way, particularly for the kind of binders that run across an entire edge of a stack of papers, like you might use for a presentation. For ringed binders, I've only heard it used a handful of times, and never seen it in print.

Caveat: I'm just a word nerd, so I've never tracked things down to primary sources. Etymology is a fairly rigorous thing, and nothing I've said here is exactly rigorous. Take it as a casual thing pulled from memory rather than something you could cite in a class assignment.

What came first, the urge to be a dick needlessly, or the lack of creativity?

Same as they always have. It's fast. You can grab taco bell in a flash compared to even the best run diner or cafe. And you don't have to sit around with a bunch of strangers that are essentially walking disease vectors to do it, unless you want to.

The draw of fast food joints has never been primarily about the food quality, or service. Yeah, you'll likely pick the place that has what you consider better food, and avoid shit service, but that's a different thing.

Even joints that pretend to not be fast food (like chikfila) only pull a small portion of their consumers on the food primarily. They might draw some customers away from other fast food places, but not from sit-down places like you're talking about

Die? It's not going to die any time soon, on a corporate level.

It's already dead in the ways that made it worth using.

That nose needs gentle pets all the time