spaduf

joined 1 year ago
[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 months ago

the more convinced I am that the AT protocol is better than ActivityPub.

That's because AT was very deliberately designed to solve problems with ActivityPub.

I wonder what sort of bridging can be implemented between AT Protocol and ActivityPub implementations.

The folks over at https://fed.brid.gy/ have been working at this. Much to the chagrin of the folks over at Mastodon.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago

That is for the fediverse overall. Most of that comes from Mastodon. I personally have a little more faith in fedidb.org and their numbers. Also, worth noting the criteria for active users on Lemmy was recently changed to include votes, whereas before it only counted comments and posts.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

mastodon, bluesky, and lemmy are just going to be footnotes in history

Only if they squander their lead. So long as they innovate in ways befitting the fediverse form, they will probably maintain their position. That said, it seems to me like modular systems like bonfire will probably leapfrog the existing platforms pretty quickly.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 21 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Absolutely wild that this is a group of minors.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 16 points 9 months ago

As somebody who works in this field, I think we have already lost the fight in reserving artificial intelligence for what I would now call theoretical AI or maybe agent theory. The meaning has changed, and we are not putting that toothpaste back in the tube. Big social's algorithms are certainly AI under the new generally understood meaning.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

Yes but if you want to do just want anything more advanced than putting users in a list you're out of luck.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You're absolutely right and I definitely shouldn't be making broad statements like that. Another thing I've found is that if you can stomach the effort (or do this from the get go), it's a good idea to put all your academic or professional accounts into a single list. It's nice to check into a slightly smarter feed from time to time.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In this context or generally?

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think this is a money making move. The previous CEO was absolutely overly focused on monetization and this move is a step away from that. I should've addressed this more explicitly in the above comment but even for the players who actively monetize, AI is a money incinerator.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 12 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Mastodon really does seem to rally around braindead takes and misinformation. The culture over there can be hard to stomach sometimes.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 92 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Tell me this is a good thing.

Mozilla has long been the most ethical player in this space (while still producing SOTA ML). All of their datasets/models are open source and usually crowdsourced. Not to mention, their existing work is primarily in improving accessibility.

ALSO, the other half of this story is that Firefox is becoming the primary focus again. Everybody's freaking out about the AI stuff but that's because they're only reading the headlines. The programs they've shut down are things like Hubs (Mozilla's metaverse platform), the VPN, and the sensitive data scrubber (which was using a third party service anyway).

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago

Though, it's tough to pull from the headline/discussion this pivot is explicitly meant to refocus on the browser.

As far as the AI stuff goes, Mozilla has long been the most ethical player in this space. All of their datasets/models are open source and usually crowdsourced. Not to mention, their existing work is primarily in improving accessibility. It's really hard to see how this is a bad thing.

view more: ‹ prev next ›