spujb

joined 2 years ago
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

guys am i high or is this making a lot of sense 😳

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

use this as an educational opportunity then and post the truth so that we can all grow ! why are u keeping it to yourself

A notable example of the observer effect occurs in quantum mechanics, as demonstrated by the double-slit experiment. Physicists have found that observation of quantum phenomena by a detector or an instrument can change the measured results of this experiment. Despite the "observer effect" in the double-slit experiment being caused by the presence of an electronic detector, the experiment's results have been interpreted by some to suggest that a conscious mind can directly affect reality.[3] However, the need for the "observer" to be conscious is not supported by scientific research, and has been pointed out as a misconception rooted in a poor understanding of the quantum wave function ψ and the quantum measurement process.[4][5][6] Wikipedia

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

killjoy. i understand the concept but i also find this funny because i know how to have fun :)

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 months ago

ah! yummy 🔥🍾

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

i don’t get it but happy for u :)

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 months ago
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i’m not advocating anything lmao i am saying it’s shitty to laugh in peoples faces.

if there is a region with high homless density compared to few vacant homes and it is determined that building housing is cost effective in service of that community i will not laugh in the aid worker’s faces.

i will not laugh. that’s all i mean, and if you actually tried to pay attention you would notice it’s all i have ever said.

i am blocking you now thanks for thoroughly embarrassing yourself

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 months ago (8 children)

radical compared to the status quo, thanks for allowing me to clarify

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 months ago

Thanks for sharing!

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That number includes abandoned and run down homes that are currently unlivable, houses that aren’t actually on the market because they’re being remodeled, they exist in the middle of nowhere where people don’t want to live, etc.

Would love a citation? The commonly cited numbers I know explicitly only include livable homes. Remodeling also excluded.

a lot of people say that housing is commodified and that’s why it sucks. This is not accurate. Housing is treated as an investment that should go up in value over time

yup and that sucks so bad BASED BASED BASED thanks for sharing

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 months ago

RAHHHHH USA USA

 
1
rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
1
rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
0
rule (files.catbox.moe)
 
 

Also bird flu.

Learn more:

And, the below is certainly not robust data, but also the Google Trends support my observations. “Trump Greenland” beats everything but bird flu by more than 3x right now.

 
 
0
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

there’s more than shown here and it’s more than just these users too 😭

if you find the thread don’t piss in the popcorn (brigade) but also please maybe don’t bring it back here i don’t want 400 notifications of entry level “is almond milk milk” vegan discourse

 

this user is a mod of a huge .world news community btw

 

hate twitter, but this is something its community notes gets right. it takes all of two clicks for us to see a removed comment and when it’s “Reason: misinformation” that does nothing to combat the misinformation.

like you don’t have to link articles for obvious stuff like antivaxx shit (though that’s appreciated). but when it’s like deep lore on political parties or terrorist groups, or when the comment is like 80 paragraphs long “reason: misinformation” doesn’t really cut it and doesn’t inform the community of what specific point(s) of information were false.

for all but the most egregious misinformation (such as those encouraging or threatening harm, which should be modded anyway for those reasons), if you can’t link an article in the modlog it’s almost better to leave the comment up and let your community do a paragraph by paragraph fact check for you. otherwise it’s just kind of festering out there unchecked, your servers are still hosting the misinformation, just in modlog form.

i think giving info correcting links was more common in the past so no idk why it’s uncommon now. hoping this can be some friendly constructive criticism :)

 

[https://lemmy.cafe/post/4821164](Lemmy is a worse platform for women than Reddit was)

and no the context does not make this better

 
view more: ‹ prev next ›