spujb

joined 11 months ago
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 9 points 9 months ago (4 children)

hate this take. can we stop calling normal, non-techie people idiots?

it’s like saying the safety on a gun was designed for babies and makes the FOSS community look toxic as fuck.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 37 points 9 months ago (15 children)

linux users when the windows sudo replica still values user security and uses uac and doesn’t just let you make changes to core system files because you happened to know a four letter command 👿👿👿👿

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

you are right, i don’t know how LLMs are trained, but ironically, this is a perfect example of a minority being privelaged by a system, and racism is still very much involved.

an important assumption you have to consider: in your example, why did the AI know what race people are in the first place? it seems a small consideration but it’s so wildly significant.

the modern understanding of race was not present throughout all of history, and only arose in the 17th century. without getting into the weeds, the fact that your fictional AI can distinguish between whiteness and non-whiteness already means it was designed by someone who understands those structures, and let them slip into the AI itself.

a perfectly well-meaning and anti-racist designer would prevent the AI from even recognizing race at all costs, both directly by sanitizing training data to remove race from the inputs, and indirectly by noting correlations with other data (such as sports, in this article) and controlling for that.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

fucking bonkers that institutionalized racism can exist to such a degree that it shows up IN OUR COMPUTERS.

we’re so racist we made the computers discriminatory too.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

not good, the companies are not going to face any consequences for this unless something is done:

Schellmann, meanwhile, is calling for industry-wide "guardrails and regulation" from governments or non-profits to ensure current problems do not persist. If there is no intervention now, she fears AI could make the workplace of the future more unequal than before.

like every such extreme cost cutting measure, this is only going to hurt workers.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

yeah i did read the article. to clarify for anyone confused, folks are already bypassing the TPM requirement to get these windows installs working in the first place. the POPCNT instruction issue is only affecting installs that are already using this workaround to force W11 to run on a device it doesn’t want to work on.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

edit: pls see jj4211s comment for an actual rebuttal. the below is just me being curious and probably ill-informed. i do appreciate your help if you are feeling helpful tho.

please identify the material changes that come with an end of support that force users to artificially switch.

in general i am entirely on the position against ms, but i genuinely do not see any concrete evidence of a “force”; ms’s own lifecycle policy even notes that products will continue to get “security and non-security updates.”

again i am anti-corporate, but i’d very much like to be accurate in my criticism, so any insight into the forces at play are appreciated 🙂

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (14 children)

do hack to make software run on unsupported hardware

software stops working with update

surprised pikachu

“this is why i switched to linux” no shut up lol. this is not an issue for any average user and if you had the ability to hack the TPM requirements you have the ability to fix your borked install. this issue affects no one else. 🙂🙂🙂

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 9 months ago

logarithmic scale

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

“it’s not an MBA thing, it’s a technical progress thing”

proceeds to describe how MBAs (Samsung marketers and business leaders) are doing this with technology

again with the acting like i disagree with you? lol

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

i don’t know why you worded your comment like we are in disagreement haha

samsung is forcibly inserting themselves into the chain of custody. in a world where cell phone video is finally spotlighting existing police brutality , the idea that my evidence could get thrown out because of some MBA’s idea of what constitutes a “real picture” is nightmarish.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 22 points 9 months ago (5 children)

bullshit positions like Samsung’s seem harmless till you see photographic evidence get challenged in court because the waters are already so muddied.

almost happened in the Rittenhouse case.

view more: ‹ prev next ›