staticlifetime

joined 1 year ago
[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fedora is just flat-out king for desktop IMO. It has packages that are new, but not unstable. Lots of Red Hat engineers use it as a daily driver, so fixes come quick, and it has a pretty large user base. It's made for this stuff.

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

OpenSUSE is not a fork. It's the base.

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

For all the shit Red Hat has gotten, Fedora Linux is still actually a community base distro.

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I used Debian full-time eons ago, but last time I tried in 2019, it was a dog of a desktop OS to me compared to Fedora. It works fine as a server, but it's simply not a great desktop.

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you never touch the command line yeah, but how many of us Fedora users don't do that?

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

This looks phenomenal-looking. That graph widget should be standardized too.

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just another case of "you will own nothing...". Come on over to Linux, where the ISOs are plentiful.

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I don't know about that. IBM is traditionally stupid, yeah, but they wanted Red Hat for a reason. The CentOS debacle altogether was Red Hat, not IBM, and I don't think they are doing too much day to day operational mandates for stuff like this. I would not be surprised if this was just a Red Hat thing. I know it's easy to blame IBM, but I don't think it's that simple.

view more: ‹ prev next ›