stickly

Kind of a philosophical question from your response: is any type of advertising OK? I don't doubt that advertisers can and will continue to pollute every inch of our lives, but in a vacuum this is basically an ideal ad. Its minimal, clever, untargeted, temporary, for a decent show, and not massively over produced or jarring. To me, those aspects make it OK and I won't complain.

However, there's simply not enough opportunities like this for advertising to exist as an ethical profession. There's no point cheering it on or "voting with your wallet", it's not possible for 90% of products to have this serendipity. But I can't say "fuck all advertising" when it does technically serve a purpose and can very occasionally be done in an ethical and interesting way. I'd rather see this specific post than the majority of banal memes on my feed.

Receiver of Wrecks is a pretty metal title tho. If he's telling me to do something I might listen

Sure, if you go in with the idea that the ban won't impact their social media usage then it obviously follows that it won't impact their usage. And that might be true for a while, but:

• Declining usage compounds and any barrier to entry drops users. Reddit wouldn't be suing to stop this if they didn't think it was a major threat to their platform.
• The single largest factor in platform membership is peer membership, and the most influential peers in adolescent development will always be real life friends
• A cohort aging up doesn't mean that the next cohorts will automatically follow. Late millennials weren't tied to Facebook, Gen Z wasn't married to Snapchat, a drop in TikTok usage will eventually precipitate a need to migrate somewhere else
• Global social media usage, by human screen time, has been declining from its 2022 peak (excluding a North American exception), with the largest drop among younger users

Putting all of this together, it seems very plausible that child bans could hasten this decline. It would probably work twice as well if more public money was directed to alternatives (third spaces, clubs, etc...).

But imagine that you get stuck in a water pipe or wedged somewhere in a rain storm. Glowing is annoying but not nearly as bad as potentially drowning because your car crashed into a lake and you can no longer escape through the window.

You can covertly buy and take illicit drugs all by yourself and have a good time. Bypassing a ban to get on a social platform with very few of your social peers is... pointless?

So what if you get to watch a tiktok from the other side of the world, none of the kids in your class are sharing that experience and building the peer pressure.

IIRC master was the normal ass English word for your superior in any type of subservient role (employees, servants, indentured, school children, etc...). In the "Master Bedroom" instance, master makes sense as the title of a household patriarch.

As soon as they started forcing non-whites into new world chattel slavery, all tiers of white classes suddenly thought it was degrading to use the same word they forced on the lesser races. This is where English started adapting new words for the old usage of master, such as boss from the Dutch baas.

If anything, refusing to use master in any context is far more racist than normal usage. You're perpetuating the idea that a word's use by slaves automatically (and retroactively) sullies it for all time.

The controversy over his public presence (both real and contrived) has convinced me that if you want to be any kind of serious public figure you should never-ever-ever put anything off-hand in text or on video. Let alone stream yourself for hours at a time.

Take some time to compile your thoughts and don't just spit out hot takes. It'll get you attention for sure, but it's not worth the scrutiny and drama hunting. For real, look at the people in this thread latched onto a single clip of a dog yelping weeks (months?) ago. Is that such a core and defining feature that I should completely discredit him? Doesn't seem like it, but I also don't want to dig through hours of content to find out.

Your ISP is kind of dogshit if it's forcing 15-30m of downtime overnight every few weeks. And power outages are kind of a weird thing to focus on.

Point being that these are not "skill issues". AWS's actual uptime over the last decade was something like 5 or 6 9s, 99.9 is just their official SLA. From where many people live (shit ISP, brown outs, floods, tornadoes, etc...), they can't even match that bare minimum. God forbid budget enters the equation (no money for 3-2-1 backup? oops everything is fried from a freak accident).

So yeah you could definitely do OK with a real budget, a quality server setup and enough hours during the week for firefighting. But that's not really "self hosting", you're just making your homelab a $0 revenue small business. For the 95% of people who can't do that, they wouldn't get anywhere close to a cloud provider's service.

AWS offers an SLA of 99.9 availability, which it has usually exceeded each year. That means your server can't be down more than ~8h per year to beat it. Your residential ISP (in a nearly optimal case) has a 15-30 min service period overnight every few weeks.

Hope your area gets less than ~3 hours of power outages per year or you're going to be breaching your SLA before you even hit software.

That doesn't mean the work doesn't exist. If nobody went out of their way to do the undesirable and menial labor involved with mass agriculture then we'd all die. If you're not in a tiny, hunter-gatherer proto-society then you really do have to put in work to live. It's just our modern distribution of labor and reward that's fucked.

That has to be one of the worst guillotine designs I've ever seen, send this child back to school.

• no mouton
• curve is simultaneously less effective than a diagonal and harder to make
• tiny contact point with groove on the narrow blade side, basically guaranteed to jump on the way down or slip on impact
• no head basket or splatter shield
• no bascule, good luck shifting that body kid
• no stabilizing supports

This thing is gonna paralyze the guy, send the blade flying into the crowd, and cause a slow bleed death (if any)

That's true, it's a combination of factors. A big part is the insular nature of the team and coaching as you go higher up the ladder. If you're not thanking God in your post-win interview you're a "locker room problem"; if you want a coaching job after you retire you've gotta be on good terms with the good ol' boys network.

I do think that the brain damage does compound heavily though. I know Mormons who get out and become well adjusted people later in life; the semi-pro football players I know get more irrational and violent as the CTE sets in.