streetfestival

I hope you're right! I have very little confidence in mainstream news media these day to do anything besides serve the interests of corporations and the wealthy. Recent examples: (coverage of) Colonialist genocide in Palestine, carbon 'tax', recent capital gains tax. This issue is compounded by how few Canadians read non-mainstream news. I know you do, but I think we're clearly outliers since we're on Lemmy

Called out in parliament, maybe, but not by anyone inclined to vote for him. I've never met a Conservative voter who thinks critically when it comes to voting (and I've met several with advanced degrees). Policy and performance don't matter; they vote for 'their team' and based on beliefs - not evidence - that 'conservatives are good with money' and similar swill. It's more like being a sports fan or a religious devotee than a rational elector, ime

The petition is open from April 10th to August 8th. So far, it's received over 11,000 signatures. I just signed it. You need to provide an email address (in addition to name, postal code, etc.), which they send a link to, and by clicking that link your signature is added (this is a 1 signature per person safeguard). I looked at the collection/disclosure of personal info briefly. It looks like no info other than #s signed per province/territory will be disclosed and all personal info will be destroyed 6 months after the e-petition closes.

Link to sign the e-petition: https://www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4922

I'm sorry to hear that. Do you ever eat for pleasure if you can't taste anything?

It’s understandable that this person has this much influence, even though it’s not an elected position.

Unelected parliamentary bodies are supposed to support transparency, fairness, and debate - they're not supposed to take a prominent role in shaping policy and communicating it to the public. I think it's good that the PBO issues reports from a supposedly non-partisan perspective, but I don't think it's good how little oversight they themselves receive, as this incident reveals. The Government and Opposition (or all parties) should get advance copies of the PBO's reports for public consumption, and the published reports should include that commentary from the Government, Opposition, and/or all parties

That an unelected person or department that's part of our federal services has had and will have such a huge effect on this country's politics for several years, the next federal election, and this country's ability to respond to the growing climate crisis is a cause for concern regarding the integrity of our democracy. An investigation is warranted

And they'd also count towards enabling

Apologies, corrected to national. More importantly, how do you feel about the incumbent party in your country planning to introduce soft conscription?

The incumbent (Tory) party in the UK has included national service in their campaign leading up to next month's ~~federal~~ [edit: national] election.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c988jdxl02vo

The proposed new scheme would not be conscription, where people are legally required to join the armed forces for a period. But it would compel people by law to complete a community programme over a 12-month period, or enrol in a year-long military training scheme, when they turn 18.

Thanks for sharing. I'm glad you've got something that works well for those headaches and is cost effective. Most drug industry meds are to be taken daily. There's not a lot of money in something like this for the drug companies lol

That's an incredible difference. How much do you consume and how often?

When I finished reading this, I heard a 'deflating party' sound in my head