No, that's why the author asserts that with their signed-of-by. It's what I do if I use any LLM content as the basis of my patches.
stsquad
If the 2-10% is just boilerplate syscall number defines or trivial MIN/MAX macros then it's just the common way to do things.
If you are using MakeMKV when ripping you can override the filename template. So I name them for example "Show s01e04+" based on the disc I'm ripping. Then once encoded it's relatively quick to rename the files with the full episode number. I personally use dired in Emacs because a macro makes short work of the renaming but I'm sure other solutions are possible.
My kids are growing up in this environment and they already have an eye for ai slop. I suspect it's the same thing that led to OpenAI's TikSlop "product" is getting canned. After society had gotten over the sugar rush excitement of new and shiny toys I suspect the interest will fade and people will crave the connection you get from real art made by real people.
At least I hope that is what will happen. We might have to do something to hold the tech companies accountable for their dopamine trigger machines though.
Where are you seeing the 2-10% figure?
In my experience code generation is most affected by the local context (i.e. the codebase you are working on). On top of that a lot of code is purely mechanical - code generally has to have a degree of novelty to be protected by copyright.
I was glad to see Niko publish his initial work and look forward to seeing how it's gone.
They don't, just like they don't with human submitted stuff. The point of the Signed-off-by is the author attests they have the rights to submit the code.
I have a sneaking suspicion a lot of the posts there are just engagement bait anyway.
Especially useful on my TV's anemic Sony browser when I'm trying to diagnose of my network is crapping out or the apps are just in a go slow.
I swear people have rose tinted glasses as to the state of the init system before the current generation of system management daemons.
If you really want to have Debian without systemd there is always Duvean but the Debian architects are free to choose the technologies that solve the very real system orchestration problems that exist.

They don't have to be. They know what they asked the LLM to do. They know how much they adapted the output. You usually have to work to get the models to spit out significant chunks of memorised text.