survivalmachine

Switches are Layer-2 devices (data link layer). They operate on FRAMES and use MAC addresses to send data around between devices on the SAME NETWORK.

Routers are Layer-3 devices (network layer). They operate on PACKETS (which is basically a wrapper around FRAMES) and IP addresses to send traffic between DIFFERENT NETWORKS.

Switches may have some smart capabilities, such as creating separate logical networks (VLANs), or providing power to PoE devices, or prioritizing layer-2 traffic within a lan (CoS - class of service) and they do all the "heavy lifting" of slinging frames around to the right device on your LAN.

Routers tend to do all the "heavy lifting" of routing packets BETWEEN NETWORKS. They sit at the perimeter of networks (between your LAN and the internet, for example, or between your LAN and another DMZ LAN in your house, or maybe a GUEST LAN). They are often paired with firewall features to inspect the traffic and only allow certain types of traffic through one direction or the other, or they may simply route packets. They can also prioritize layer-3 traffic (QoS - quality of service).

A lot of things can get really confusing between the two because many routers have built-in switches, so they do some layer-2 stuff. And more expensive switches can even have some routing features to allow traffic to hop from one VLAN to another without going all the way out to a router (called layer-3 switches, though you typically don't see these in homes outside the computer enthusiast community -- they're more of an enterprise thing).

I think the reason you don't see OpenWRT or OPNSense for switches is because simple networks don't need the advanced switching capabilities that such a product would provide, and highly complex networks often need the speed of hardware-based switching and don't want to slow it down with a software layer.

Pilot Vanishing Point Yellow Rhodium Medium nib.

Was a thicker line than I prefer on my EDC anyway, but it was a beautiful pen.

I carried around a $150 fountain pen for years. Then I lost it. Not fun.

Oof. I did not know about that. That's unfortunate!

Is there a problem with your Lemmy client? My comment renders fine on Raccoon.

Maybe Logseq, too.

+FOSS like Joplin and unlike Obsidian
+plaintext markdown files like Obsidian and unlike Joplin's janky database
-less feature-rich than obsidian
-block-based instead of note-based, so a slight paradigm-shift is required

I started on it instead of Obsidian

This is the way. I started on Obsidian, and Logseq is painful in comparison. It's a good product, but I got accustomed to too many nice conveniences over the past couple of years.

That is irrelevant. We are more concerned with relative market share than raw numbers. For example, many devs will not develop towards a browser or OS that has less than 5% market share. If/when Linux market share hits 5% and even 10%, we expect marked increases in developer interest to support our OS of choice. As far as I'm aware, nobody really sets such metrics based on raw user counts, so that is a less important number for us. Your Statistics 101 course should have taught you to make sure the statistics you are measuring are relevant.

Total Recall

If you continue using our website, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website.

You literally have an "x" button in the top-right of your web browser (or similar exit feature if you've disabled or moved that).

Agreed. It should have been long and drawn out and boring like the source material.

Where is data recovery $100? In my country, data recovery is like $1000 USD to look at your drive, and then they tell you how much they can recover and a full quote.