symthetics

joined 2 years ago
[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

The people behind that startup are in tears strangling each other wishing they thought of this.

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

This whole idea of infinite growth is so fucking stupid because it's just not possible.

Nothing grows infinitely. It's a complete denial of reality, and because businesses refuse to accept the idea they cannot infinitely grow, we end with no plans for periods of no growth, which ends up in layoffs and the poorest getting fucked while the morons demanding infinite growth take all the money and try and do it again somewhere else.

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sharing your opinion is not the same as sharing your art.

I agree that monetisation as a standard probably isn't ideal, but I think you're fooling yourself if you think a lot of the artists and musicians here aren't posting with some intent to drive you to their monetised content. Social media is a great place for artists to promote their work in general.

I thought the whole point of the fedi was to encourage open social media. If you don't want to see artists or monetised content, you can block those creators or instances. The fedi isn't subject to your preferences or mine, after all. I'm sorry, but I don't think you get to decide what does and doesn't happen here.

The thing is, monetisation wouldn't even work the same way here because there is no algorithm, so it's not like you'd get (as) many people trying to create rage bait to game the algorithm.

Your initial post came across as if you begrudge any creators or artists making any money from what they post here. If I misinterpreted your position then my bad, and I don't want enshitification either (although given the decentralised framework of the fedi, I'm not sure how that could even happen in the traditional sense).

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

100% agree. This attitude actually ends up devaluing art and entertainment because it basically boils down the to the idea that "it's not a real job."

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I bet you'll find that some do have patrons or subs or something similar.

If people want to share their work for free, that's cool. If people want to charge for their work, that's also cool.

The fact is, being good at something creative takes the same time and dedication as anything else, but because it's entertainment or art people expect it for free 'because it's a passion'.

Should doctors passionate about medicine not get paid either?

The fact is if you want a rich culture full of awesome art, the people creating that art need to be fucking paid.

I'm not necessarily in support of monetising the fediverse or anything like that, but I also don't begrudge anyone creative trying to actually get paid fairly for their work and time.

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I agree. Lemmy isn't as progressive as it thinks it is generally. Just like other social platforms, the concept of a nuanced discussion is mostly (not always) an alien one.

People want things split neatly into 'good' and 'bad' or 'us' and 'them' and melt down when anything challenges those neat little boxes. We all do it to some degree, and I get the appeal of it.

But if we want things to ever really get better, we need to be able to have better discussions about important issues and accept things are very rarely binary.

Placing Kamala or Walz on some pedestal as if they're perfect is just as blind as doing so for Trump.

I'm not in the US, and yes I would vote for Kamala, but I think it's important to be aware they are not perfect and the fight for a better society/world won't be over if they win.

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Divisive? Let's call him what he is: a dribbling, brain-dead misogynistic cunt grifter (and now potential pedo).

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe not the majority, but clearly it's common enough to warrant mentioning for the people affected by it.

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

Point 2 is better explained in the article. I don't take this as discrimination, more that while I will always aim to empathise and understand as much as I can about the black experience and be an ally, it's something I will never have direct experience of, so maybe there are some conversations that I don't need to muscle in on.

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

Yeah haha, I think point 2 is well explained in the article, maybe it's too generalised here.

Still good general advice for posting in my opinion, better to think in general.

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (9 children)

I don't really understand why this is getting so massively downvoted.

Seems perfectly reasonable to me as a white person. Yes, point two could be more nuanced, but otherwise aren't all these downvotes kind of illustrating the point the OP is making here?

[–] symthetics@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Just use an ad blocker? I've used that wiki loads and honestly can't blame the guy for wanting to try and make a bit of money for his and other people's time and effort.

That said maybe patreon or something would have been a better idea.

view more: next ›