tacosanonymous

joined 1 year ago
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago

Riker's motto is, "Would."

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds useful.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 91 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is this their attempt to get out of that negligence suit where that person died and they tried to force arbitration from the clause in a free trial of Disney plus?

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why tf did they choose that picture though?

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

Gotta feed the orphan crushing machine.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

It doesn’t matter how awful he is. They only see that he's a great tool for creating a white evangelical theocracy. They’d act this way for Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Dahmer, or (insert awful person here).

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sunk cost? Tech worship?

I’m so jaded, I question my wife when she says the sun will rise tomorrow so I really don’t get it either.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Absolutely this. Their commitment to corruption would not tolerate a "good guy" whatever tf that actually means.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

Right. A mistrial for easily avoidable reasons would be a waste of time and money.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 115 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Is this not potential grounds for a mistrial and a solid appeal?

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Forgive me. I’m old and my memory seems to be failing.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (30 children)

That doesn’t seem very good for the price.

view more: ‹ prev next ›