tb_

They've got to keep their profit margins, or the CEO's and shareholders might need to take a paycut.

I'unno, I would've assumed there'd be some discussion on it. I only come to 196 every so often and don't otherwise visit Lemmy so I'd find it hard to do a vibe check.

Anyway, thanks for the slightly more insightful response, over "oh, .world, lmao"

That doesn't sound great, might you have some further reading on that?

suck googles dick! For artists!

I'm not telling you to do that; I'm saying your initial statement is wrong.

I wouldn't have been on Lemmy if it wasn't for moving away from big tech.
But now it seems people take issue with that as well because I went with the basic bitch option when signing up, or did something horrific happen with .world whilst I was keeping away from social media in general?

Very cool. I love discrimination.

I did want to say one more thing, though, but feel free to ignore.

If you'd said something like "a one time donation supports a creator more than years of Premium ever would", I would not have argued. But what you are saying is plainly false.

I'd expect most resent the shitty split

That does not prove your point of them not getting any support, though.

I suppose that is so; but if you'd ask them whether they'd also rather have the ad revenue, I would assume most of them would say yes.

Ah, yes. Make fun of me for signing up with some domain when I was still clueless about Lemmy. Thanks. Really appreciate the generalisation.

YouTube has a revenue split with it's creators? Ads (and therefore Premium) are often a good part of a creator's income?

It may not support them by a lot, but it supports them infinitely more than blocking all ads.

There's a Premium Lite subscription which includes ads on certain kinds of videos (among which music, I believe)

That's not what he said??