techwooded

joined 2 years ago
[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm interested where this comes from too. Is it just because they aren't a FOSS project?

 

I’ve been thinking of using Murena Monile for my cell carrier (USA) because they appear to have good privacy terms, though I’m a little on the fence using a T-Mobile MVNO due to political reasons. Does anyone know of a similar style carrier that uses Verizon’s or AT&T’s network?

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Similar idea to how the Dao works in Daoism. "The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao"

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For audiobooks, I personally use Libro FM, though audiobooks.com is also an alternate source. Unfortunately if you're looking only at price, you won't be able to move past Audible because they employ so many shady and bad-for-authors practices that their prices are artificially low. If you're only interested in getting DRM-free Cory Doctorow books, Craphound.

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

I'm not some great logician or anything, but in its most basic framing "You don't need to worry about surveillance if you have nothing to hide" would be along the lines of a proving too much fallacy as the conclusion is much too broad for the argument of just having nothing to hide. As with a lot of informal fallacies (fallacies made due to content and/or context of the argument), you could probably ascribe a few of them to this statement, for example you could probably correctly state that this is a thought-terminating cliché as well.

Depending on how it is deployed, as described in one of the comments of the linked post, this could also constitute a formal fallacy (reasoning with a flaw in its structure), specifically denying the antecedent. As a TL;DR, the structure would have to be "If you have something to hide then you should worry about surveillance [if p then q], therefore if you have nothing to hide then you shouldn't worry about surveillance [if !p then !q]".

In my personal view call it a fallacy or not, the strongest arguments against "nothing to hide" have nothing to do with its fallacious nature or lack thereof. Additionally, demonstrating that an argument is fallacious just demonstrates that the argument needs to be reconstructed, rephrased, or better supported, not that its conclusion is false (else you fall victim to argument from fallacy, aka the fallacy fallacy).

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

For me the most influential was Matt Bruenig. He's extremely knowledgeable about Nordic model socialism as well as the building of a good welfare state.

Specifically, his explanations about how the way people frame welfare program is incorrect as it's not a vehicle of Socialism itself. As a TL;DR, people incorrectly assume it's about vertical redistribution (high income to low income), where the correct way to frame it is horizontal redistribution (e.g. a single lawyer that only has to take care of themselves and a lawyer who has 3 kids, a disabled sibling, and two elderly parents that they have to take care of should be able to live similar lifestyles).

He's also a labor lawyer and knows basically everything there is to know about the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), so it's helped reframe a lot of modern issues for me into a labor mindset.

He has a lot of stuff posted on The People's Policy Project as well as his personal website Matt Bruenig Dot Com. He also does a Podcast with his wife, Liz who is a great writer with the Atlantic and another lefty, where they end up talking about a lot of this stuff. The podcast feed also has in it a Socialism Series where Matt goes through the "canon" of socialist thought like Charles Fourier, Karl Marx, John Francis Bray, etc.

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure about Volla Phone, but it looks like FuriLabs will run on T-Mobile or their MVNOs (see here)

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I went through all this, and it seems Jellyfin was the problem. I added this into my yaml:

ports: - "8096"

And now I can access the server.......if I use port 32769....which I figured out by using docker compose ps -a. I also had restarted it once, and before the restart, I accessed it with 32768. Any idea on how to fix this? I don't even know what's causing it

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

UPDATE: For those keeping score at home, I needed to change the mount from /etc/caddy to /usr/share/caddy and now it works. However, I have a new problem:

Once I get all three containers (caddy, jellyfin, and tailscale) up and running, now I can't access it. All three report as being up and I checked the logs and none list any errors, but when I go to my tailnet address, it can't find anything. I've even put the port number in and it can't find anything. Any ideas?

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the info, I'll try using a different mount point. Which directory would be best?

Do not use /root inside or outside of a container for plain file access. That’s insane.

Yeah I agree, I don't know where that came from in the initial error. That line in the yaml file had the path as ~/Jellyfin/jellyfin-tailscale/caddy/conf/Caddyfile so it was in my user directory

You also don’t mention if Podman is the underlying runtime managing the container

I'm not using Podman

 

Hey everyone, I'm currently trying to run Jellyfin with Tailscale using docker compose and a reverse proxy through Caddy. I'm using this guide to do this. After configuring the yaml, I tried to start things up and Tailscale and Jellyfin started, but Caddy wouldn't start and it gave the following error:

Error response from daemon: failed to create task for container: failed to create shim task: OCI runtime create failed: runc create failed: unable to start container process: error during container init: error mounting "/root/Jellyfin/jellyfin-tailscale/caddy/conf/Caddyfile" to rootfs at "/etc/caddy/Caddyfile": create mountpoint for /etc/caddy/Caddyfile mount: cannot create subdirectories in "/var/lib/docker/overlay2/325e35ec5a4c8d8bac5d7576e2deeb4b8365af027486e232ad78b458708b639b/merged/etc/caddy/Caddyfile": not a directory: unknown: Are you trying to mount a directory onto a file (or vice-versa)? Check if the specified host path exists and is the expected type

I checked the Caddy Image information here, and modified the yaml to mount the Caddyfile directory instead.

New code looks like this ~/Jellyfin/jellyfin-tailscale/caddy/conf:/etc/caddy

Now when I restart the services with Docker Compose, all three start, however Caddy (and therefore Jellyfin) won't run, they continually try restarting. By looking at it with docker logs caddy, I see that it throws out this error over and over:

Error: reading config from file: read /etc/caddy/Caddyfile: is a directory

I've inspected both the Caddyfile in /etc/caddy and in ~/Jellyfin/jellyfin-tailscale/caddy/conf using file Caddyfile, and both say they're Caddyfile: ASCII text.

What am I missing and how do I fix it?

EDIT: Forgot to put in links

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

Don't know much about xTiles, but Joplin is my go to for notes and things

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago

"You should know there's an effort in Congress to ban [insert democratic principle here]"

Basically any headline right now

[–] techwooded@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Idiocy, Actual

16
Thorium Browser? (thorium.rocks)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by techwooded@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

Curious on how good this fork of chromium is for privacy. Same person does the Mercury browser too I think

 

Hey everyone. Does anyone know of a good alternative to Google Flights other than like Expedia, Kayak, etc? Bonus points if they have an API too

 

Anyone know where the setting is to do this? I prefer having the message preview next to the inbox list (as shown on the website, see the picture), but the default appears to have it along the bottom of the screen. Thanks

 

Hey everyone, still on the iOS train for the time being, and want to enable 2FA for my Lemmy account. Currently the way this is done, it gives a link and that link default opens in Keychain, however I want to add the token to 2FAS. Anyone know how to do this?

 

Each of the top 4 seeds gets their own quarter, with all things going to seeding would put 1-4 and 2-3 as the semifinals which all makes sense. But the Slams seed down to the third round (32), but don't maintain this pattern, at least not completely. For example, in the US Open Men's Singles this year, the first couple seed matchups in the third round are 1-26 (not 1-32), 16-24 (not 16-17), and 12-19 (not 9-24). They still maintain each seed having their own slice below the third round, just curious as to why they randomly distribute 5 through 32 through these slices of the draw.

 

Zhang Shuai (who was the #2 seed of the tournament) withdrew after this call. Umpire refused to get the Supervisor even though Zhang asked for them. She ended up complaining to the umpire multiple times before withdrawing.

view more: next ›