themurphy

The idea of AI is not the problem. It's the execution. Both in it's used wrong and that the people wont benefit.

If we could all leave work 2 hours earlier because of enhanced production, we would all fight for this shit.

But that's not gonna happen.

You can meassure social media manipulation. View number information can both be scraped and looked at manually.

They might lie now and faking those numbers, as you suggested, "how honest would you be".

But the first hours didnt lie.

Yeah, it's very possible! And I firmly believe that you would need to bring these features for broad adoption.

It would require a server and open source software. You dont need anything crazy for it.

Most of the software already exists. You only need to put them together.

I 100% agree. But it didnt work like it does today.

You could not collab, because the software wasnt build to take advantage of shared drives, which will bring back all the following issues as before.

Best case is open source software with the same funtionality as Docs or Word, but you can hook it up to any servers at setup.

Build a Wireguard VPN inside the programs for making it just as easy for the masses to use them.

I dont want the "cloud". I just want the same productivity.

Thing is, cloud features are very good for being productivity. And also for minimising mistakes, because you dont have multiple copies.

Exactly, and if you need to go on a long trip, you would stop anyway for food, toilet, rest etc.

Fast charging is still very nice, but it's not necessary.

I remember one of the arguments against EV's were that "there's so few chargers compared to gas".

And then you realise that chargers are literally at homes, workplaces, parking lots and ALSO at gas stations.

Which makes speed less important. The headline is spot on.

"If there are ads"

WTF where do you live?

"to drive"

It's literally correct.

It's not 1/9th to own or registre. But it certinly is cheaper in reperations and service.

Well, honestly?

Since these certificates are not banned nor up for debate, the NSA probably already have a way to get all the data through another loop hole.

Yes, it protects against "attacks" from outside, but it's naive to expect they dont have another way in which goes beyond LetsEncrypt.

Is anyone wonders why it's a problem it's under US juristriction:

Look up the US Cloud Act. It's everything the media told you China was, but in the hands of an orange dictator.

It's funny how many rules there's made by the party who always talk about freedom.