threeganzi

joined 2 years ago
[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

They look really nice and healthy! Keep a look out for aphids, they’ve attacked my pepper plants and are almost impossible to get rid of. I’ve spent hours defending my plants, looking like a mad man.

Getting some ladybugs to feel at home is the only thing that has worked for me. My ladybugs started laying eggs which is great. Just make sure you can identify them so you don’t kill them at first sight.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Per trip is a completely useless metric as you say, that’s the reason.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

It’s the American standard for titles I think.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Didn’t it collapse because they walked in unison, causing resonance?

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it seems to be the case as China didn’t respect the deal it made with UK to leave Hong Kong autonomous. If 3.5% of China did that it would most likely be a blood bath, be it a violent or non-violent protest.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think we’re all aware. And Hong Kong isn’t (wasn’t) China in terms of governance(“one country, two systems”). China broke the deal it made with UK, which said Hong Kong would be autonomous until 2048, after which it would be incorporated into China.

But you’re right, not much to do when China claims authority and no one defends its right to free speech, democracy and autonomy.

Edit: added some need nuance on the “one country, two systems”.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Hong Kong was supposed to be free to control itself until 2048, democracy and free speech etc. China the decided that Hong Kong was starting to getting a little too free and started to tell the sitting president to shut the protests down.

China eventually took back control and instituted a national security law that could be used for pretty much anything after the crackdown didn’t quell the unrest.

I was actively following it live as it unfolded. It was very sad to see how much young people fought for basic freedoms and still lost it.

I remember being torn between my general non-violence stance and also understanding the protestors reciprocating the police violence.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 62 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

Tell that to Hong Kong demonstrators on June 16, 2019, estimated by organizers at 2 million people marching. Hong Kong had a population of 7.5 million at the time.

Sure there was violence both before and after that protest, but mostly caused by violent crackdown by police.

But did it fail because there was violence or was violence a sign of stronger opposition? Causation vs correlation and all that.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, didn’t know that. Thank you for educating me.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I think you’re thinking of tear gas rounds. Trying to bounce rubber bullets sounds less predictable. But yeah, don’t shoot this close, especially not at a peaceful citizen.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

It applies to smaller cities as well as fat as you I’m aware, not just mega cities.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I think it’s established fact that you can’t reduce congestions by adding more lanes and roads. Not because of bad road design but because the amount of cars will fill up those new lanes. So saying ‘cars cause congestions’ is pointing at the fact that regardless of how many roads or lanes we have the will be filled. Hence roads aren’t the problem, but cars are.

view more: next ›