timestatic

If the treaty says the military would react to any attack of a member stack with duty to defend all, the countries wouldn't get to vote on it. Only for outward missions this would be needed

Would you care to explain your reasoning?

I mean the EU army does not need to replace national armies initially, the army could grow into it. I think long term it would make defense a lot more efficient and save budget which could be spent on improving the lives of the people or hardening defenses better.

But an EU army wouldnt be set up without automatic response/duty to protect member states would it?

I mean if it gets implemented it will get the duty to actually like.. you know defend its own member states. There would be no coordination or possibility to veto in this case. A veto could only be a problem if we tried to send the EU army somewhere outside of the member states and have them take on a mission there

Hope Lineage and /e/OS implement the fix soon as well

Okay lets see how this plays out. I feel bad for Tusk because he wants to change so much but the President can't block him on a large part of it. I remember when Poland had the conflict where PIS tried to place the highest polish courts and national law over EU law but don't know when or if that ever got resolved

Honestly one all-nighter sounds like most I'd do. I don't think its worth it, I can just look up how others experienced it without feeling awful in the end

Can't you get a letter of authorization to make decisions for your partner and vice versa?

I mean you can also give your partner a letter of authorization to make medical decisions for you in case you aren't able to make decisions yourself. You dont really need marriage for that

XKCD is gold

What an unexpected post on lemmy even for a shitpost community