underscores

joined 1 year ago
[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The github page for overleaf seems to indicate the community edition is AGPL.

Google is still appealing it, so at best that will happen next year. But yeah, they're probably adjusting their budget in anticipation.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Mozilla is set up as a non-profit with a for profit company as a subsidiary. The corporate Mozilla handles working on Firefox, mostly using money from Google for setting it as the default search engine. Because of that separation I don't think they can easily mix those two piles of money together.

There's this section from their FAQ:

Don’t Mozilla products, like Firefox, earn income?

Firefox is maintained by the Mozilla Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation. While Firefox does produce revenue — chiefly through search partnerships — this earned income is largely reinvested back into the Corporation. The Mozilla Foundation’s education and advocacy efforts, which span several continents and reach millions of people, are supported by philanthropic donations.

There's Mines3D on android, although the graphics are still 2d and it's a pain to play.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some other fediverse software like hubzilla and sharkey let you migrate posts, so I wouldn't say it'll never happen. I don't think anyone is working on it though, so probably not anytime soon.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I feel like it's really far from being open. Besides the training data not being open, the more popular ones like llama and stable diffusion have these weird source available licenses with anti-competitive clauses, user count limits, or arbitrary morality clauses.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

No. It's got a "source available" license allowing only non-commercial use, and revokes the license for anyone who tries to sue them.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think they switched to usually using bing results last year. Their support site mentions they use both backends. I'd guess which one you get depends on which API is cheaper for each country.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think that's still closed, just poorly done in a way that isn't very accessible.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

That's what burned in means.

I added an extra line break, but it already looked fine in the default webview and in Jerboa. Normally lists don't need line breaks around them.

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

For anyone who wants to know the difference between these terms:

  • subtitles - just includes the dialogue
  • captions - also includes description of other sounds
  • closed - text is stored separately from the video, and can turn on and off while watching
  • open - text is part of the video image itself
[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why?! The whole point of federation is to let people join communities even when they don't have an account in the same server.

For people who've used lemmy or the rest of the fediverse yes, but most people don't know that yet. If someone shares a post from your site with their friends or a facebook group, they're not going to look into how lemmy works to sign up elsewhere.

  1. people that are looking for a community in a niche interest, do not find it, and go back to Reddit.
  2. people that are in a big instance and create (or sometimes, recreate) a community for a popular topic. This happens quite often and not because they were not satisfied with the existing communities, but just because they could not find them.

The idea of having topic-specific instances is an attempt to mitigate issue #2.

I'd prefer it if topic specific instances were more popular too. I just think that letting people making accounts tied to their favorite topics would get more people interested in joining them.

I feel a technical solution like federation pulling in lists of communities with would help more with discoverability.

Not my experience. A few examples:

  • No one complained about the mods from !linux@lemmy.ml, yet I've witnessed endless discussions about moving away from lemmy.ml.

I'm not sure how that goes against what I said. That's mostly people disliking the admins.

  • Beehaw defederated from LW, so this forced users of these instances to "choose" between the communities and/or create accounts on both of them if they wanted to keep following the whole conversation.

Similar issues could happen even if users are separate from the communities. Beehaw could defederate your instances, and lemmy world could defederate programming dev or something, and people would need other accounts if they want to see everything.

  • Personally, I do not want to join or participate extensively in communities that are on LW if we have a topic-specific instance for it. I know that I am not the only one.

Me too. I usually avoid lemmy world communities unless there isn't an active community elsewhere.

view more: next ›