vas

Not sure yet, a bit too far away to tell. Living in NL though, so could definitely try to join if the tickets are affordable enough for me..

I'll copy my comment from that other thread (since I'm subscribed to both communities):

Though it's nice to have support from wealthy people.. Building a cult around any single rich person for them to give grants to their liking is not a good idea.

Instead I believe you need to fight for your right to have privacy. Currently it's Europe who is at risk with ChatControl ( https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ ). At other times, it's other countries. Some open projects (like Lemmy!) get funded by the European Commission. I believe this is a healthier approach than to believe in good rich guys who'd save you.

Though it's nice to have support from wealthy people.. Building a cult around any single rich person for them to give grants to their liking is not a good idea.

Instead I believe you need to fight for your right to have privacy. Currently it's Europe who is at risk with ChatControl ( https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ ). At other times, it's other countries. Some open projects (like Lemmy!) get funded by the European Commission. I believe this is a healthier approach than to believe in good rich guys who'd save you.

It's not only the efficiency boost. What about safe concurrency? Or about the tooling - does sbt really compare favorably to cargo? (I'd say "no", having used both over multiple years)

No problem; thanks for trying to help!

Do you know if it works with Signal? (Doesn't seem to be.. Dunno why. Static build of the app? Non-http-based transport technology used by Signal?)

Based on the comments so far, maybe something like this makes sense:

Warning: Private messages in Lemmy are not End-to-End encrypted, so the respective instance owners are technically able to read them. Please use a platform with E2E encryption for private messaging. Lemmy recommends Element.io and XMPP.

I agree. That's why I propose to clarify the wording.

Yes. And I think saying "messages in Lemmy are not End-to-End encrypted" is clearer communication than "messages in Lemmy are not secure".

Good to know! I was really eyeing Triodos back in the day, due to what looked like a good ethical stance, but it didn't work out at the time. Nice that they've fixed it! (I've updated my message above as well to include the bank.)

With respect to 2FA, if you want to be more ready for any future next time, you could migrate to an open-source TOTP app. E.g. andOTP. I use this one, it's fine. The underlying standards don't change in decades, so you can choose any compatible client and be without trouble for years and years. And it may be good to do in any case, googlified phone or not. Good apps also tend to provide password-protected backups.

I have no knowledge about RCS though, never used it so can't tell. Otherwise GrapheneOS user for ~2 years, before that LineageOS, before that CopperheadOS for another few years.

You can use andOTP if you want a FOSS app on Android. If you're a hardcore no-Android-at-all user (or considering), you can use KeePassXC on the desktop. This kind of defeats the purpose of 2FA, but on the other hand people with KeePassXC tend to have strong passwords due to ease of their maintenance, so you don't need 2FA as much to begin with.

TL&DR; use andOTP on Android or KeePassXC on Linux Desktop.